The macroevolutionary impact of an innovation reversal in ray-finned fishes
Brownstein, C.; Harrington, R. C.; Wood, J. E.; Ghezelayagh, A.; Alencar, L.; Munoz, M. M.; Thacker, C. E.; Near, T. J.
Show abstract
The evolution of new traits can drive species diversification by facilitating the use of new resources, but environmental change may turn these same adaptations into liabilities.Trait loss is also often associated with the origin of new ecologies, but how losses modulate diversification remains unclear. The swim bladder allows ray-finned fishes to regulate their buoyancy and exploit ecosystems throughout the water column, yet this organ has been lost many times among species-rich lineages. Here, we show that timing and ecological context control the macroevolutionary effects of swim bladder loss. Many lineages of fishes lost the swim bladder over the last 66 million years as they specialized for benthic habitats where buoyancy regulation is unnecessary. Swim bladder loss enabled the descendants of these benthic fishes to diversify in the deep sea where extreme pressure makes its inflation untenable, and in the frigid, oxygen-saturated Southern Ocean, where loss of the oxygen delivery mechanisms required for swim bladder inflation carries little physiological cost. Yet, we detect a selective filter associated with swim bladder loss during extreme global warming 56 to 50 million years ago, when its absence limited the capacity of fishes to escape ecological disruptions on the ocean floor. These contrasting patterns explain how the loss of a complex trait promoted major ecological transitions without increasing overall diversification through deep time. As human activity drives rapid global warming, the evolutionary legacies of swim bladder loss may again shape the fate of marine fish diversity.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.