An M-learner approach for heterogeneous mediation analysis with high-dimensional omics mediators
Li, X.; Wei, P.
Show abstract
Causal mediation analysis is widely used to identify biological pathways linking exposures to outcomes, but most methods assume homogeneous mediation effects across individuals. In high-dimensional omics settings, this assumption can mask important heterogeneity driven by demographic, genetic, or environmental factors. We propose the M-high-learner, a flexible framework for detecting heterogeneous mediation effects with high-dimensional mediators. The method identifies mediators with subgroup-specific indirect effects while distinguishing them from null or homogeneous signals and controlling the type I error rate. It is computationally efficient, scalable, and yields interpretable sub-types. Simulation studies show that the proposed approach achieves high power while maintaining accurate error control. Applications to the Framingham Heart Study and the Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis reveal that the mediation role of gene expression in sexs effect on high-density lipoprotein varies across subgroups defined by body mass index and age. Our framework provides a practical tool for uncovering heterogeneous biological mechanisms in high-dimensional genomic studies. Author SummaryBiological processes linking risk factors to disease often differ across individuals, but many existing methods assume these processes are the same for everyone. This can hide important differences between groups. We developed a powerful method to identify when these pathways vary across subgroups using large-scale molecular data. Our approach detects differences in how intermediate biological factors contribute to outcomes in populations defined by characteristics such as age and body mass index. Applying our method to population studies, we found that some biological pathways operate differently across groups, suggesting that key mechanisms may be missed when differences are ignored. Our work provides a tool to better understand how disease-related processes vary across individuals, which may support more targeted and personalized approaches to health research.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- LPM: a latent probit model to characterize the relationship among complex traits using summary statistics from multiple GWASs and functional annotations 94%
- BEATRICE: Bayesian Fine-mapping from Summary Datausing Deep Variational Inference 94%
- Identifying cancer pathway dysregulations using differential causal effects 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Causal mediation analysis for time-varying heritable risk factors with Mendelian Randomization 95%
- Simultaneous estimation of bi-directional causal effects and heritable confounding from GWAS summary statistics 95%
- Discovering genetic interactions bridging pathways in genome-wide association studies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mendelian Randomization Analysis Using Multiple Biomarkers of an Underlying Common Exposure 94%
- Fast Lasso method for Large-scale and Ultrahigh-dimensional Cox Model with applications to UK Biobank 93%
- A mixed-model approach for powerful testing of genetic associations with cancer risk incorporating tumor characteristics 92%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.