Back

CD1b-specific T cells are transcriptionally closer to conventional CD4 T cells than to innate-like NKT and MAIT cells

Hsieh, A.; Lopez, K.; Leon, S.; Calderon, R.; Lecca, L.; Murray, M.; Moody, B.; Suliman, S.; Van Rhijn, I.

2026-08-28 immunology
10.64898/2026.08.25.747105 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Unconventional T cells recognize non-peptide antigens presented by molecules other than the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) proteins. Among unconventional T cells, natural killer T (NKT) cells, which recognize CD1d-lipid complexes, mucosal-associated invariant T (MAIT) cells, which recognize MR1-metabolite complexes, and {gamma}{delta} T cells, are thoroughly studied. CD1b presents self- and mycobacterial lipids to relatively understudied T cell subsets. Like MAIT cells and type I NKT cells, CD1b-specific cells include subpopulations with conserved TCRs. Consequent to their recognition of a nearly monomorphic antigen-presenting molecule, CD1b-specific T cells might share innate-like features with MAIT, type I NKT, and {gamma}{delta} T cells. Due to their low frequency in the peripheral blood, CD1a-, CD1b-, and CD1c-specific T cells have been studied predominantly as in vitro-expanded clones, so even basic information about their native ex vivo immunophenotypes is lacking. Here, we sort and transcriptionally profile ex vivo two T cell populations that recognize CD1b presenting mycobacterial mycolipids and compare them with conventional CD4 and CD8 T cells, {gamma}{delta} T cells, NK cells, MAIT cells, and NKT cells. We show that both the invariant TCR-expressing CD4+, CD1b-GMM-specific germline encoded mycolyl-reactive (GEM) T cells, as well as the diverse TCR-expressing CD1b-GMM-specific T cells, are transcriptionally closer to conventional T cells than to the innate-like T cell populations {gamma}{delta}, MAIT and type I NKT cells. Thus, despite their recognition of non-polymorphic antigen presenting molecules, CD1b-specific T cells show adaptive rather than innate-like transcriptional features.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.