Back

Molecular and functional profiling distinguishes PACS1 syndrome variant from PACS1 loss-of-function in iNeurons

Schroder, A. L.; Gomez-Maqueo, X.; Golinski, S. R.; Phoumyvong, C. M.; Smith, R. S.; Guemez-Gamboa, A.

2026-09-01 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.25.747101 bioRxiv
Show abstract

PACS1 syndrome is a rare neurodevelopmental disorder caused by a recurrent de novo missense variant (p.R203W) in the PACS1 protein. However, it remains unclear whether the p.R203W variant acts through a loss-of-function or alternative mechanism. Here, we used isogenic iPSC-derived neurons (iNs) to directly compare the effects of PACS1 p.R203W to complete loss of PACS1 function. Using a combination of proteomic, biochemical and electrophysiological approaches, we identified molecular and functional phenotypes associated with each genotype. While PACS1(+/R203W) and PACS1(-/-) iNs shared phenotypic abnormalities, the overall molecular and functional consequences of the p.R203W variant were distinct from those caused by PACS1 deficiency. Notably, PACS1(+/R203W) presented with unique proteomic and kinase signaling signatures and a shift in stimulus dependent excitability. These findings demonstrate that PACS1 syndrome is not caused by a simple loss of function and instead support a non-loss-of-function mechanism. Lastly, our interactome analysis suggests that the p.R203W variant retains aspects of canonical PACS1 function while acquiring novel molecular interactions that could contribute to PACS1 syndrome pathogenesis. Altogether, these findings provide a framework for future mechanistic studies and therapeutic development in PACS1 syndrome. GRAPHICAL ABSTRACT O_FIG O_LINKSMALLFIG WIDTH=200 HEIGHT=98 SRC="FIGDIR/small/747101v1_ufig1.gif" ALT="Figure 1"> View larger version (20K): org.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@d1522corg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@69e4dforg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@30eebcorg.highwire.dtl.DTLVardef@899b9d_HPS_FORMAT_FIGEXP M_FIG C_FIG

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.