Back

Structure of a dodecameric double-ferritin-fold protein from an Asgard archaeon

Remeeva, A.; Anuchina, A.; Dashevskii, D.; Kurkin, T.; Semenov, O.; Mishin, A.; Osipov, S.; Li, G.; Shishkin, P.; Shuvaev, Y.; Mikhailov, A.; Kuznetsova, E.; Natarov, I.; Nikolaev, A.; Sudarev, V.; Vlasov, A.; Borshchevskiy, V.; Rogachev, A.; Gushchin, I.

2026-08-26 biophysics
10.64898/2026.08.25.747088 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Ferritins are ubiquitous iron homeostasis proteins found across the tree of life that form conserved 24-subunit cages with octahedral (4-3-2) symmetry. New types of ferritins and ferritin-like proteins are being continuously discovered, such as mini-bacterioferritins, which form smaller shells of 12 subunits, and double-ferritin-fold proteins, which act as ferroxidases but do not form shells. Here, we describe double-ferritin-fold proteins from Asgard archaea, dubbed dFTNs, and determine Cryo-EM structure of a representative from Candidatus Heimdallarchaeum endolithica. The protein forms a dodecameric shell with tetrahedral (2-3) symmetry. N-terminal (NTD) and C-terminal (CTD) domains are bridged by an ordered linker and are related by two-fold rotational pseudosymmetry. C-terminal -helix (helix E) that forms the four-fold channel in classic ferritins is repositioned to be the helix 2 out of 5 ferritin domain -helices in dFTN, with two such helices from NTD and two helices from CTD forming a pseudo-four-fold symmetry structural element. Four three-fold channels are formed by NTDs, and four other such channels are formed by CTDs. The overall arrangement of dFTN ferritin domains is similar to that of protomers in classic ferritin shells. Altogether, our findings expand the range of known ferritin family proteins and provide insight into Asgard archaea iron metabolism.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.