A flow cytometry-based screening platform for identifying candidate radiosensitizers targeting DNA repair
Naucke, C.; Rodland, G. E.; Eek Mariampillai, A.; Hauge, S.; Steive, L. H.; Bjerke, I. A.; Lindbergsengen, L.; Grosvik, A. S. G.; Siggerud, V.; Kongsrud, K.; Savu, D. I.; Stokke, T.; Syljuasen, R. G.
Show abstract
Radiotherapy induces cytotoxic DNA damage, but activation of DNA repair pathways and cell-cycle checkpoints can limit therapeutic efficacy. Here, we developed a high-throughput, flow cytometry-based screening platform to identify compounds that inhibit radiation-induced DNA repair and checkpoint activation. Reh leukemia and A549 lung cancer cells were irradiated and screened against up to 700 bioactive compounds, with DNA damage persistence quantified by {gamma}H2AX levels across independent screens. Cell barcoding using Pacific Blue staining was incorporated to enable highly accurate quantification of {gamma}H2AX across treatment conditions. The platform yielded robust and reproducible results and supported multiparametric analysis, including assessment of G2 checkpoint activation by phospho-histone H3. Largely overlapping candidate radiosensitizers were identified in both cell lines, including the multi-kinase inhibitor 5-iodotubercidin and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor omipalisib. Validation studies in lung cancer and glioblastoma models confirmed screen performance. Mechanistically, omipalisib reduced phosphorylation of the non-homologous end-joining protein DNA-PK, consistent with impaired double-strand break repair. Both compounds enhanced radiosensitivity in clonogenic survival assays. Notably, 5-iodotubercidin increased radiosensitivity in glioblastoma cells despite previous reports of radioprotective effects in normal brain tissue. Together, these findings establish a robust barcoded screening approach for identifying radiosensitizers that target DNA damage repair and checkpoint responses.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune stromal components impede biological effectiveness of carbon ion therapy in a preclinical model of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma 94%
- PLK4 inhibition as a strategy to enhance non-small cell lung cancer radiosensitivity 93%
- Sensitization to Ionizing Radiation by MEK inhibition is Dependent on SNAI2 in Fusion-negative Rhabdomyosarcoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Small-molecule Polθ inhibitors provide safe and effective tumor radiosensitization in preclinical models 93%
- MSCs Successfully Deliver Oncolytic Virotherapy to Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma 93%
- Zinc Finger MYND-Type Containing 8 (ZMYND8) is epigenetically regulated in mutant Isocitrate Dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) glioma to promote radioresistance 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- 1--4-phenylpiperazine Treatment After Brain Irradiation Preserves Cognitive Function in Mice 94%
- Short-term Topiramate treatment prevents radiation-induced cytotoxic edema in preclinical models of breast-cancer brain metastasis 94%
- Spatial Transcriptomics Characterisation of Radionecrotic Changes in Glioblastoma Patients 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of machine learning and genome-scale metabolic modeling identifies multi-omics biomarkers for radiation resistance 95%
- Priming versus propagating: distinct immune effects of an alpha- versus beta-particle emitting radiopharmaceutical when combined with immune checkpoint inhibition 94%
- DNA damage and somatic mutations in mammalian cells after irradiation with a nail polish dryer 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- ClonoScreen3D: a novel three-dimensional clonogenic screening platform for identification of radiosensitizers for glioblastoma 96%
- MET Inhibitor Capmatinib Radiosensitizes MET Exon 14-Mutated and MET-Amplified Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 93%
- Risk of Clonal Hematopoiesis of Indeterminate Potential after Cancer Radiation Therapy 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.