Back

A flow cytometry-based screening platform for identifying candidate radiosensitizers targeting DNA repair

Naucke, C.; Rodland, G. E.; Eek Mariampillai, A.; Hauge, S.; Steive, L. H.; Bjerke, I. A.; Lindbergsengen, L.; Grosvik, A. S. G.; Siggerud, V.; Kongsrud, K.; Savu, D. I.; Stokke, T.; Syljuasen, R. G.

2026-08-26 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.25.747024 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Radiotherapy induces cytotoxic DNA damage, but activation of DNA repair pathways and cell-cycle checkpoints can limit therapeutic efficacy. Here, we developed a high-throughput, flow cytometry-based screening platform to identify compounds that inhibit radiation-induced DNA repair and checkpoint activation. Reh leukemia and A549 lung cancer cells were irradiated and screened against up to 700 bioactive compounds, with DNA damage persistence quantified by {gamma}H2AX levels across independent screens. Cell barcoding using Pacific Blue staining was incorporated to enable highly accurate quantification of {gamma}H2AX across treatment conditions. The platform yielded robust and reproducible results and supported multiparametric analysis, including assessment of G2 checkpoint activation by phospho-histone H3. Largely overlapping candidate radiosensitizers were identified in both cell lines, including the multi-kinase inhibitor 5-iodotubercidin and the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor omipalisib. Validation studies in lung cancer and glioblastoma models confirmed screen performance. Mechanistically, omipalisib reduced phosphorylation of the non-homologous end-joining protein DNA-PK, consistent with impaired double-strand break repair. Both compounds enhanced radiosensitivity in clonogenic survival assays. Notably, 5-iodotubercidin increased radiosensitivity in glioblastoma cells despite previous reports of radioprotective effects in normal brain tissue. Together, these findings establish a robust barcoded screening approach for identifying radiosensitizers that target DNA damage repair and checkpoint responses.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.