Back

Label Noise Limits TCR-pMHC Specificity Prediction: Improved Performance Through AlphaFold3-Based Structural Modeling and Data Denoising

Ballesteros-Cuartero, P.; Lund, J.; Nielsen, M.

2026-08-28 bioinformatics
10.64898/2026.08.25.746957 bioRxiv
Show abstract

T cell receptor (TCR) binding to peptides presented by major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules is a key step in T cell activation, and forms the basis of adaptive immunity. Predicting this specificity is therefore essential to developing effective TCR-based immunotherapies and vaccines. Despite its clinical relevance, predicting TCR-pMHC specificity for previously unseen peptides remains an open problem, with structural modeling so far the only strategy showing any predictive power in this setting. In this study, we find that this limited performance is substantially driven by label noise in the data used to train and evaluate these methods, an effect that has so far been largely underexplored. Using an AlphaFold3-based pipeline adapted for TCR-pMHC structural modeling, we achieve state-of-the-art specificity prediction, outperforming AlphaFold2.3-based and sequence based methods, and performing at par with the leading Immrep2025 competition submission. Combining this pipeline with a cluster-based denoising algorithm, we show that removing mislabeled points from a large specificity dataset increased binder ranking accuracy by more than 70% relative to the full dataset. Together, these results highlight label noise as a major factor limiting the performance that any method in this field can achieve, and show that combining structural modeling with label denoising substantially improves TCR-pMHC specificity prediction, making such approaches an attractive complement to current sequence-based approaches for refining TCR target selection.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.