Back

Plumage colour structures global patterns of mixed-species bird flocks

Aggarwal, K.; Samad, I.; Thaker, M.; Shanker, K.

2026-08-26 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.25.746914 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Mixed-species groups (MSGs) pose a particular challenge for our understanding of sociality in animals. Though MSGs are widespread social assemblages that form to enhance foraging success and reduce predation risk of participants, the role of traits in mediating grouping has received less attention. In particular, the role of body colour has not been tested quantitatively, despite the fact that visual similarity can reduce individual predation risk. Here, we examine whether plumage colour structures mixed-species bird flocks (MSFs) at a global scale. Using data spanning four continents, we developed a new metric that quantifies colour similarity among flock participants and compared observed flocks to null assemblages constructed from all flocking species at each site. We further examined whether MSF participants represented a colour subset of the available colours in the regional species pool. We found striking evidence that birds in MSFs were more similar in colour than expected by chance across all sites, indicating that plumage colour is a non-random structuring trait that shapes assembly of flocks globally. The strength and prevalence of colour structuring varied across geographies, but not flock size. Within communities, MSF participants differed systematically in colour composition from the regional species pool, occupying a restricted region of colour space dominated by yellow and brown plumage. Thus, plumage colour affects MSFs influencing both overall flock participation as well as species co-occurrence within flocks. Our findings illustrate the importance of visual traits in structuring interspecific social systems, by highlighting that birds of a feather do indeed flock together.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.