Back

Microbiota-pathogen interactions after host death:a potential determinant of pathogen evolution

von Bismarck, A.; Xie, H.; Franz, M.; Keshavarz, M.

2026-08-25 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.25.746672 bioRxiv
Show abstract

During the lifetime of many animals, the microbiota fulfills multiple functions. After death of their hosts, these microbes contribute to cadaver decomposition, with implications for forensics, fossilization and soil nutrient and microbial community dynamics. Here, we draw attention to the possibility that host microbiota can also influence the evolution of pathogen lifestyles. We hypothesized that competition between microbiota and pathogens after host death can reduce benefits to pathogens of killing and decomposing their host. To test this hypothesis, we conducted infection experiments in which we injected the entomopathogenic bacteria Pseudomonas entomophila into Tenebrio molitor larvae. Our results show that bacterial proliferation after pathogen-induced host death occurs in larvae with strongly reduced microbiota, but not in larvae with intact gut microbiota. Strikingly, we found that gut microbiota can suppress the proliferation of an about 100 times larger pathogen population. In addition, we identified a microbiota member that might have mediated competitive suppression of pathogen proliferation after host death. Taken together, our results support our hypothesis that decomposing host microbiota can effectively compete with pathogens, thereby reducing the fitness of pathogens that kill and then exploit dead hosts. Based on a reanalysis of an existing theoretical model, we conclude that the host microbiota can facilitate the evolution of more benign pathogens that are less likely to kill their host for cadaver exploitation. Thus, our findings highlight the potentially important but so far unexplored possibility that pathogen-microbiota interactions in dead hosts can affect living hosts by influencing the evolution of pathogens lifestyles.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.