Back

Pathway Modeling of Genomic and Tissue-Specific Transcriptomic Architecture Identifies Personalized Mechanisms of Atrial Fibrillation Risk

Venkatesh, R.; Deo, R.; Cappola, T.; Penn Medicine BioBank, ; Ritchie, M. D.; Kim, D.

2026-08-31 cardiovascular medicine
10.64898/2026.08.25.26361369 medRxiv
Show abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia and a major cause of cardioembolic stroke. Although polygenic risk scores (PRS) are well characterized to quantify inherited susceptibility for AF, they provide limited insight into the pathways and tissues underlying genetic risk, which are critical to uncover for individual risk prediction. In this study, we develop a pathway-level multi-omics representation learning framework that converts individual genetic profiles into interpretable biological features by integrating GWAS-derived pathway burden scores with tissue-specific transcriptomic pathway signals. We constructed machine learning models to assess population-level AF risk prediction performance across genomic and transcriptomic tissue contexts; the pathway-based global attention models substantially improved risk prediction performance over PRS and other baselines (AUROC improved from 0.601 to 0.738). Transformer and graph neural network frameworks then assessed individual-level pathway interpretability, revealing heterogeneous contributions from electrical signaling, cardiac development, and DNA repair pathways to AF risk. This added interpretability highlights the potential of this pathway approach to enable more mechanistically informed risk stratification than static PRS by capturing underlying heterogeneity. To independently assess whether prioritized pathways reflected cardiac regulatory biology, we compared pathway rankings with transcriptional effects predicted by the AlphaGenome foundation model. Variants in highly ranked pathways showed significantly greater predicted effects on expression in atrial and ventricular tissues (FDR = 0.032) relative to controls, providing orthogonal evidence that the model identifies biologically relevant mechanisms. Overall, this work reframes polygenic risk from a single measure of susceptibility to tissue-informed pathway mechanisms, providing a framework for interpretable genomic stratification in complex diseases.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.