Obesity Endotypes Unmask Heterogeneous Responses to Healthy Lifestyle Behaviors
Malik, D.; Kim, M. S.; Shim, I.; Sui, Y.; Abou-Karam, R.; Song, M.; Won, H.-H.; Natarajan, P.; Ellinor, P. T.; Fahed, A. C.
Show abstract
Background Lifestyle interventions are central to obesity prevention and management, yet interindividual variability in response remains incompletely understood. Here, we leveraged genetically defined, distinct obesity endotypes to examine lifestyle-body mass index (BMI) associations across biological pathways. Methods In the UK Biobank, we analyzed 305,713 participants with partitioned polygenic scores (pPSs) representing 10 obesity endotypes. We evaluated interactions between endotype-specific genetic susceptibility and physical activity, diet, sedentary behavior, and sleep on BMI using multivariable linear regression. Primary findings were externally evaluated in the All of Us Research Program using Fitbit-derived lifestyle measures. Results Favorable lifestyle behaviors were associated with lower BMI for all obesity endotypes, but the magnitude of these associations varied significantly across endotypes. Higher endotype-specific pPSs strengthened the benefits of physical activity (7 endotypes), healthy diet (3 endotypes), nonsedentary behavior (5 endotypes), and adequate sleep (7 endotypes) on BMI. Distinct endotypes demonstrated the greatest responsiveness to different lifestyle domains, with the metabolically unhealthy endotype showing the strongest interaction with physical activity, metabolically healthy endotype with sedentary behavior, hypothalamic dysregulation endotype with diet, and hypoinsulin 2 endotype with sleep, corresponding to differences in BMI of 0.22-0.49 kg/m2 between the highest and lowest pPS deciles. These interaction patterns were consistent in the All of Us cohort. Conclusions Obesity endotypes modify the association between lifestyle behaviors and BMI, demonstrating that responsiveness to lifestyle behaviors is heterogeneous and pathway dependent. These findings provide a framework for precision obesity prevention by identifying individuals who may derive greater benefit from specific lifestyle interventions.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Genetic and environmental effects on weight gain from young adulthood to old age and its association with body mass index at early young adulthood: an individual-based pooled analysis of 16 twin cohorts 93%
- Integrating Genetic and Transcriptomic Data to Identify Genes Underlying Obesity Risk Loci 93%
- Genetic and environmental influences on educational disparities in adult weight change: an individual-based pooled analysis of 11 twin cohorts 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Polygenic risk of obesity and BMI trajectories over 36 years: a longitudinal study of adult Finnish twins 92%
- The Pediatric Obesity Microbiome and Metabolism Study (POMMS): Methods, Baseline Data, and Early Insights. 91%
- MRI assessment of adipose tissue fatty acid composition in the UK Biobank and its association with diet and disease 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Diet pattern determines circulating FGF21 levels while distinct FGF21 variants influence diet pattern and FGF21 levels 92%
- Dietary isoleucine content defines the metabolic and molecular response to a Western diet 92%
- Brainstem GLP-1 neurons modulate physiological satiation and drive sustained weight loss in obese mice 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Time-varying and tissue-dependent effects of adiposity on leptin levels: a Mendelian randomization study 92%
- The causal effects of body mass index (BMI) on childhood symptoms of depression, anxiety disorder, and attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder: a within family Mendelian randomization study 91%
- Mendelian randomization suggests a bidirectional, causal relationship between physical inactivity and obesity 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.