Estimating the contribution of coding mutations to autism
Nadig, A.; Fu, J.; Satterstrom, F. K.; Auwerx, C.; Zhang, Z.; Torene, R.; Lu, W.; Karczewski, K. J.; The Autism Sequencing Consortium, ; GeneDx, ; Buxbaum, J. D.; Kruszka, P.; Talkowski, M.; Robinson, E. B.; O'Connor, L. J.
Show abstract
De novo mutations in protein-coding regions are strongly associated with autism, and family-based sequencing studies have identified numerous genes that harbor excess mutations in probands. However, the aggregate contribution of this class of variation to autism remains unclear. Here, we model the distribution of de novo autosomal coding variant effect sizes in 38,680 autism trios to estimate fundamental features of de novo genetic architecture. We find that damaging de novo single-nucleotide variants and frameshift indels explain 3.4% (95% CI: 2.1% - 4.7%) of autism variance on the observed scale. Approximately 7.0% (95% CI: 5.6% - 8.4%) of cases carry a large-effect mutation (rate ratio > 5), and most such mutations are incompletely penetrant. Although hundreds of genes make some nonzero contribution, 50% of mutational variance on the autosomes is explained by just 15 genes. De novo enrichments vary across cohorts with different ascertainment strategies; making projections for future trio studies, we show that many large-effect genes remain to be found.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- MIRAGE: a Bayesian rare variant association analysis method incorporating functional information of variants 94%
- Partitioning gene-mediated disease heritability without eQTLs 94%
- The relationship between genotype- and phenotype-based estimates of genetic liability to psychiatric disorders, in practice and in theory. 94%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.