Back

Pseudo-monopolar sensing of subthalamic beta power helps to predict optimal DBS contacts in Parkinson's Disease

Witzig, V. S.; van der Weide, A.; Hubers, D.; Keulen, B. J.; Schikora, J.; Kaplan, J.; Memarpouri, A.; Drescher, L.; Roediger, J.; Brandt, G. A.; de Bie, R. M. A.; Schuurman, P. R.; Beudel, M.; Kuehn, A.

2026-08-28 neurology
10.64898/2026.08.25.26361305 medRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is an effective treatment for Parkinson's Disease (PD), but identifying optimal stimulation contacts is time-intensive. Beta-band activity (13-35 Hz) from local field potentials (LFP) correlates with motor symptoms and attenuation by dopaminergic therapy and DBS supports its role as a programming biomarker. The recently introduced Electrode Identifier (EI) feature of Medtronic PerceptTM neurostimulators may facilitate beta-guided contact selection. Objective: To evaluate whether pseudo-monopolar STN beta power obtained using EI predicts optimal stimulation contacts and compare its performance with reconstructed bipolar recordings and MPR. Methods: LFPs were recorded in 69 patients using EI and Electrode Survey (ES). Prediction accuracy was assessed using predefined ranking rules and compared with clinically selected contacts. Agreement between EI, ES, and MPR was evaluated. Motor outcome was assessed using MDS-UPDRS-III. Results: EI predicted clinically selected contacts above chance (TOP1: 45%, p = 0.010; TOP2-80: 57%, p = <0.001), whereas ES exceeded chance only under more inclusive selection criteria (TOP1: 38%, p = 0.073; TOP2-80: 55%, p = 0.0021). Accuracy did not differ between methods (TOP1: p = 0.720; TOP2-80: p = 1.000). EI showed highest agreement with MPR and tended to select ventral contacts. Neither method predicted motor outcome, although EI-matched contacts showed a trend toward greater improvement. Due to technical constraints, one-third of EI recordings were excluded. Conclusions: Pseudo-monopolar STN beta power provides clinically relevant information for DBS contact selection with performance comparable to bipolar approaches. Further improvements are needed before clinical implementation.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.