A Spanish grammaticality judgment task for neurodegenerative diseases: inflectional, transitivity, and word order comprehension in PPA and Alzheimer's Disease
Mancini, S.; Biondo, N.; Calabria, M.; Martin, C.; Garcia Hernandez, E.; Filella Merce, J.; Selma, J.; Garcia Castro, J.; Rubio, S.; Sala, I.; Sanchez Saudinos, M. B.; Grasso, S.; Illan-Gala, I.; Bejanin, A.; Lleo, A.; Fortea, J.; Santos Santos, M. A.
Show abstract
Impairment in the comprehension of morphosyntactic and transitivity information does not feature in current diagnostic guidelines for primary progressive aphasia (PPA) or Alzheimer's Disease (AD), despite research reporting delayed sensitivity or insensitivity of these clinical populations to these linguistic domains. Moreover, studies rarely compare all three PPA variants and AD within a single design, and the literature is weighted toward English, whose reduced morphology may not capture the full range of comprehension difficulties these populations experience. We developed a computer-based acceptability judgment task covering comprehension of the nominal and verbal inflection paradigm in Spanish, transitivity and word order. We recruited Spanish-speaking patients diagnosed with non-fluent/agrammatic, logopenic and semantic variants of PPA and typical AD. Psychometric evaluation confirmed good sensitivity, internal consistency and moderate correlation of task accuracy with language and neuropsychological measures. The four clinical groups retained the ability to endorse grammatical sentences but showed selective difficulty rejecting unacceptable ones. AD and the three PPA variants showed impaired comprehension of inflectional and transitivity information, whereas sensitivity to word order was comparatively preserved. Exploratory analyses revealed that short-term memory, working memory, and verbal semantics were differentially associated with sentence evaluation performance within and across groups. VBM analyses identified the left posterior temporal cortex as the main neuroanatomical correlate of grammaticality judgment performance. These findings extend prior English-language research to Spanish, demonstrating that morphosyntactic and transitivity deficits are a robust and cross-linguistically consistent feature of neurodegenerative language decline, and highlighting the importance of developing language-sensitive assessment tools for underrepresented linguistic populations.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Sex Differences in Cognitive Performance in Alzheimer's Disease: Insights from the ADAS-Cog-13 94%
- High frequency post-pause word choices and task-dependent speech behavior characterize connected speech in individuals with mild cognitive impairment 93%
- Neurodevelopmental effects of genetic frontotemporal dementia mutations revealed by total intracranial volume differences 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Verbal fluency tests assess global cognitive status but have limited diagnostic differentiation: Evidence from a large-scale examination of six neurodegenerative diseases 96%
- Impaired semantic control in the logopenic variant of primary progressive aphasia 96%
- Lexical Markers of Disordered Speech in Primary Progressive Aphasia and ‘Parkinson-plus’ Disorders 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Self-reported word-finding complaints are associated with cerebrospinal fluid beta-amyloid and atrophy in cognitively normal older adults 94%
- Delayed primacy recall performance predicts post mortem Alzheimers disease pathology from unimpaired ante mortem cognitive baseline 93%
- Anterolateral entorhinal cortex thickness as a new biomarker for early detection of Alzheimer's disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Semantic Memory in Healthy Apolipoprotein ε4 Carriers: A Systematic Review 93%
- Left anterior temporal lobe is necessary for efficient lateralised processing of spoken word identity 93%
- Establishing and evaluating the gradient of item naming difficulty in post-stroke aphasia and semantic dementia 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.