Back

HP6/Umbrea, a rapidly evolving Drosophila HP1-family paralog, is a candidate HP1a-recruited plasticizer of heterochromatin

Lee, U.; Zhao, L.

2026-08-27 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.08.24.746899 bioRxiv
Show abstract

HP6/Umbrea, a rapidly evolving Drosophila (Heterochromatin Protein 1) HP1-family paralog, has well-documented sequence and regulatory evolution but an under-studied molecular function. In this manuscript, we hypothesize that HP6/Umbrea acts as an HP1-recruited plasticizer, providing support for this model using coarse-grained molecular-dynamics simulations of HP1a condensates. Retaining only the dimerizing chromoshadow domain (CSD), HP6/Umbrea notably lacks independent chromatin-binding capacity but binds HP1a directly, co-localizing with it in vivo. We report that when covalently tethered to an HP1a carrier, HP6/Umbrea partitions into HP1a condensates ~6-fold more strongly than when free, supporting HP1a-mediated recruitment as its entry route. Once incorporated, HP6/Umbrea leaves the phase-separation threshold, interfacial tension, and host partitioning statistically unchanged, but monotonically lowers dense-phase density. These observations are consistent with a spacer function rather than generic loss of cohesion. Importantly, unchanged short-time internal mobility suggests a packing effect, predicting increased permeability to large transcriptional machinery, potentially resulting in a position effect-variegation (PEV)-like modulation of heterochromatic silencing. Finally, comparative sequence analysis shows the C-terminal tail is a recently originated, purifying-selection-constrained innovation, which is consistent with an evolved function in this region. In sum, our simulations suggest a mechanistic basis for how HP6/Umbrea may have evolved as a condensate plasticizer and thus potentially act as a rheostat for leaky transcription.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.