Back

Expression of immune checkpoint VISTA represents a differentiated state of cancer cells and plays a role in regulating actin cytoskeleton

Wang, C.; Liu, Y.; Li, J.; Cao, Y.

2026-08-26 cancer biology
10.64898/2026.08.24.746888 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Immune checkpoint blockade has revolutionized cancer therapy, but the therapeutic efficacy is limited. Clinical trials on blockade of newly identified immune checkpoints didn't show promising result, suggesting that it might be insufficient to understand the function of immune checkpoints in cancer merely in the context of immunity. Here, we found mutually exclusive expression patterns of the immune checkpoint VISTA (or VSIR) and the neural stemness factor SETDB1, an oncoprotein that promotes immunoevasion, in xenograft tumors, suggesting that cells with high VISTA expression represents a differentiated, and hence, less or non-malignant state in tumor. Non-neural differentiation factors HHEX, MYOD1 and PPARG promote, whereas oncoproteins KRAS (and the mutant KRAS(G12D)) and SOX2, both being embryonic neural factors, repress VISTA expression. This tendency can be inferred from the finding that neural stemness is the core property of cancer cell. Manipulated expression of VISTA in cancer cells generated no significant effect on cell tumorigenicity and differentiation state, but led to change in cell morphology and actin cytoskeleton. Mechanistically, VISTA regulates a key cytoskeleton regulator, WASF2, leading to the change in cell morphology, which might interfere with signal transduction of immune response. The results suggest that 1) high expression of a protein in tumor might represent a less or non-malignant state, targeting of which would leave malignant cells intact, and consequently, leading to weak or even no therapeutic efficacy, a key factor worth considering for target selection; 2) immune checkpoints might play other roles in cells that interfere with regulation of anti-tumor immunity.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.