Hormones: what are they good for?
Ridout, S. A.; Vellanki, P.; Nemenman, I.
Show abstract
Animals use long-range signals, such as hormones and neural signals, to coordinate the actions of distant organs. There is no precise, quantitative framework that explains the problems these control systems must solve and thus predicts their behavior under varied conditions. We consider this problem in the context of blood glucose regulation by the hormone insulin, the failure of which produces diabetes. We show that existing mathematical models of glucose regulation admit equivalent control strategies with no hormones at all, and thus cannot explain the need for hormonal regulation. We therefore introduce a minimal model of inter-organ variations in local glucose, and show that control strategies based on local glucose measurements face severe trade-offs between different control objectives. In contrast, we show that hormonal control signals from the pancreas can overcome these limitations. By exposing the benefits of hormonal control, our work paves the way to a detailed understanding of physiological design principles, with possible implications for the engineering of an artificial pancreas.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A generic deviance detection principle for cortical On/Off responses, omission response, and mismatch negativity 94%
- Distinct dopaminergic spike-timing-dependent plasticity rules are suited to different functional roles 94%
- The voltage and spiking responses of subthreshold resonant neurons to structured and fluctuating inputs: persistence and loss of resonance and variability 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.