Endocannabinoid-dopamine interactions mediate incidental associations in the hippocampus
Fundazuri, U. B.; Barrera-Conde, M.; Rampini, E.; Gomez-Sotres, P.; Ioannidou, C.; Pinho, J.; Gonzalez-Portilla, M.; Beriain, S.; Busquets-Garcia, A.; Ferreira, G.; Marsicano, G.
Show abstract
Reinforced conditioning allows individuals predicting future events with high confidence. However, many daily behaviours rely on unreinforced connections of neutral stimuli, called Incidental Associations (IAs), which enhance predictive capacity in unstable environments and are observed across species. IAs can be studied through sensory preconditioning paradigms, where two neutral stimuli (S1/S2) are presented together in a preconditioning phase, followed by classical conditioning of S1 with a potent reinforcer. As a result, subjects present a direct response to the S1 stimulus, but also display mediated responses to the S2 stimulus never explicitly reinforced, indicating IA formation during preconditioning. Our previous work demonstrated that type-1 cannabinoid receptors (CB1 receptors) in the hippocampus are essential for this IA formation. As dopamine signaling is also important for this process, we investigate the role of interactions between these dopamine-cannabinoid systems in IA memory formation in the hippocampus. Extending our previous work on odor-taste association, using light-sound association we showed that global CB1 receptor knock-out or specific hippocampal CB1 receptor deletion also blocked mediated responses to sound (S2) while direct response to light (S1) was unaltered. Focusing on dopamine, we then found hippocampal dopaminergic activity is enhanced during paired presentations of S1 and S2 and that blockade of dopamine D1 receptor during preconditioning S1-S2 associations abolished mediated response to S2. Interestingly, mice lacking CB1 receptors specifically in D1-receptor-expressing cells (D1-CB1-KO) failed to show mediated responses for either light-sound or odor-taste associations, identifying this CB1 receptor population as critical for IA formation. Enhanced activation of CB1 receptors, through either increase of endocannabinoids (using degradation enzyme inhibition) or exogenous stimulation by cannabis-derived Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), was able to promote the formation of IAs under insufficient conditions. The effect of endogenous CB1 activation, but not THC, was blocked in D1-CB1-KO mice indicating that IA-facilitation by endogenous and exogenous receptor activation rely on different mechanisms. Overall, these data uncover new mechanisms underlying unreinforced associative learning.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Altered heterosynaptic plasticity impairs visual discrimination learning in adenosine A1 receptor knockout mice 94%
- Compromising tyrosine hydroxylase function establishes a delusion-like temporal profile of reinforcement by dopamine neurons in Drosophila 93%
- Distinct progressions of neuronal activity changes underlie the formation and consolidation of a gustatory associative memory 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The minimal behavioral time window for reward conditioning in the nucleus accumbens of mice 94%
- Establishment of a social conditioned place preference paradigm for the study of social reward in female mice 93%
- A retrieval-counterconditioning procedure diminishes reinstatement of appetitive memories in humans 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Independence of Cued and Contextual Components of Fear Conditioning is Gated by the Lateral Habenula 94%
- Amphetamine disrupts haemodynamic correlates of prediction errors in nucleus accumbens and orbitofrontal cortex 92%
- Pretrauma cognitive traits predict trauma-induced fear generalization and associated prefrontal functioning in a longitudinal model of posttraumatic stress disorder 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.