Back

Host breadth, genomic exchange and antimicrobial-resistance evolution in East African Campylobacter

Bahati, S. Y.; Mwakalapa, E. B.; Mung'ong'o, H. G.; Makaranga, A.; Maghembe, R. S.

2026-08-24 evolutionary biology
10.64898/2026.08.24.746677 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Campylobacter jejuni and Campylobacter coli occupy diverse animal reservoirs, yet the genomic processes associated with variation in host breadth remain poorly resolved in East Africa. Publicly available isolate-level whole-genome sequencing data from Ethiopia, Kenya, Tanzania and Uganda were analysed using a standardized population-genomic workflow. After genome reconstruction, species confirmation and quality filtering, 722 genomes were retained, comprising 586 C. jejuni and 136 C. coli. Animal-host breadth among sufficiently represented Ethiopian C. jejuni lineages was standardized by exact rarefaction across chicken, cattle, goat and sheep hosts. Fifteen lineages were eligible for discovery analyses. Host breadth showed no detectable association with homologous recombination, accessory-genome fluidity, human representation, antimicrobial-resistance class burden, recurrent AMR evolution or regional recurrence. Six discovery lineages recurred outside Ethiopia, but only one occurred in at least two validation countries, and validation animal sampling was insufficient for inferential replication of host-breadth or AMR associations. Recurrent within-lineage AMR evolution was restricted to a small number of determinants, lineage combinations involving tet(O) and gyrA T86I. Analysis of complete single-copy loci identified a restricted set of strongly supported cross-species placements, providing evidence consistent with localized interspecies introgression without implying whole-genome admixture or transfer direction. These findings indicate that animal-host breadth in regional C. jejuni populations is not explained by simple lineage-wide measures of genome exchange, human occurrence or AMR burden, but instead reflects lineage-specific combinations of ecological opportunity, selected genomic variation and population history.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.