Back

Inhibitory Evoked Potentials as a Spatially Dependent Intraoperative Marker of Clinical Tremor Reduction

Paraskevopoulos, Z.; Crompton, D.; Iskin, S.; Fan, H.; Kalia, S. K.; Hodaie, M.; Lozano, A. M.; Milosevic, L.; Hutchison, W. D.; Germann, J.; Lankarany, M.

2026-08-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.24.746616 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventral intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus may be used to treat medication refractory essential tremor. Using recordings from in vivo human Vim neurons, our previous work has suggested that evoked potentials (that we termed quasi-evoked inhibition) ~2 ms following high frequency microstimulation pulses may be related to inhibitory synapses onto the Vim. Here, we investigate whether (i) quasi-evoked inhibition is related to clinical tremor reduction, and (ii) if quasi-evoked inhibition is dependent on the stimulation location within the Vim. By developing an objective determination of the presence or absence of quasi-evoked inhibition and utilizing accelerometer recordings, we showed that recordings with quasi-evoked inhibition at 100 Hz microstimulation exhibit greater tremor reduction than those without (P < 0.05, BF > 30). The number of stimulation pulses with quasi-evoked inhibition is also correlated with tremor reduction (rho = 0.18, P < 0.05) at all stimulation frequencies >=100 Hz. Furthermore, by analyzing microelectrode trajectories reconstructed from structural MRIs, we found that proximity to the ventral caudal border (P < 0.005) and to a previously established sweet spot (P < 0.05) are anti-correlated with the number of stimulation pulses with quasi-evoked inhibition. Our findings suggest that quasi-evoked inhibition is a potential biomarker of tremor reduction by means of network inhibition, and the more posterior regions of the Vim may allow for better recruitment of inhibition. This may be useful for closed-loop stimulation design.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.