Vocal Tract Disparity and Potential Implications for Speaker Recognition
Danner, T.; Vyshnevetska, V.; Friedrichs, D.; Moran, S.
Show abstract
Perceptual experiments show that listeners recognize female speakers with lower accuracy than male speakers. Automatic speaker recognition systems may also show performance bias against female speakers even when training data sets are gender balanced. The underlying reasons for this discrepancy are unclear. Here, we apply geometric morphometrics to quantify sex-related morphological vocal tract disparity -- the extent of shape variation -- across both resting and articulatory configurations. We find that male speakers exhibit greater disparity in both resting and articulatory configurations. This morphological idiosyncrasy may in turn generate more discriminable acoustic signatures and offer a biological explanation for higher recognition accuracies for male voices by humans and machines. Our results suggest that innate variation in vocal tract morphology may contribute to performance bias in voice technology and voice perception by human listeners.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- A microscopic investigation of the effect of random envelope fluctuations on phoneme-in-noise perception 94%
- Acoustic parameter combinations underlying mapping of pseudoword sounds to multiple domains of meaning: representational similarity analyses and machine-learning models 94%
- Head-related transfer function predictions reveal dominant sound transmission mechanisms in a dolphin head 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.