Personalized Knowledge-based Graph Neural Networks and Regression Analysis for Computational Diagnosis of High-Risk Cardiovascular Disease Patients
Lampadarios, T.; Karathanasis, N.; Antartis, R.; Pfeifer, B.; von Lewinski, D.; Sourij, H.; Spyrou, G. M.; Oulas, A.
Show abstract
Acute myocardial infarction (MI) is a major precursor to heart failure (HF), yet few biomarkers are routinely used to predict post-MI HF, and limited therapeutic options exist to prevent its development. Furthermore, identifying patients at extremely high risk of recurrent MI remains challenging. These gaps highlight the need for improved biomarkers, therapeutic targets, and computational approaches for risk assessment and treatment-response prediction. To address risk assessment, we developed a systems bioinformatics (SB), graph-based framework representing patient information as personalized networks and integrating omics, clinical, and molecular prior-knowledge data. Graph neural network (GNN) machine learning (ML) models were compared with conventional ML approaches. Two large-scale public plasma proteomic datasets were used to predict post-MI HF. To investigate treatment response, regression models were applied to longitudinal clinical data from >400 hospitalized patients enrolled in the EMMY trial evaluating empagliflozin. ML-driven feature selection identified proteins and clinical parameters with the greatest predictive value. The graph-based framework demonstrated strong and consistent performance across independent post-MI cohorts. GNN models outperformed conventional approaches, including generalized linear models and XGBoost, particularly when attention mechanisms were incorporated. Using biomarker panels alone, the best GNN achieved an external test AUC of 0.82, compared with 0.77 for the best conventional ML model. When biomarkers were combined with clinical and demographic variables, GNN and conventional ML models achieved AUCs of 0.80 and 0.77, respectively. Regression models also showed promise for predicting biomarker changes associated with treatment response, with the best model achieving a test RMSE of 0.56. Feature-importance analysis identified NT-proBNP (NPPB), cardiac troponins (TNNI3/TNNT2), and prior HF history as the most influential predictors, consistent with established clinical evidence. Overall, these findings support graph-based ML and regression analysis as promising approaches for improving post-MI HF risk prediction and therapeutic response and identifying clinically relevant markers.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 92%
- Simple Models Versus Deep Learning in Detecting Low Ejection Fraction From The Electrocardiogram 92%
- Knowledge Discovery with Electrocardiography Using Interpretable Deep Neural Networks 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Identification of Digital Twins to Guide Interpretable AI for Diagnosis and Prognosis in Heart Failure 93%
- Clinical Knowledge Extraction via Sparse Embedding Regression (KESER) with Multi-Center Large Scale Electronic Health Record Data 92%
- Continuous-Time and Dynamic Suicide Attempt Risk Prediction with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Integrating feature importance techniques and causal inference to enhance early detection of heart disease 93%
- Enhanced machine learning and hybrid ensemble approaches for coronary heart disease prediction 92%
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.