RObotic WAlking for children who CAnnot WAlk (RoWaCaWa): Impacts on Physical Function and Physical Activity from a 12-week robotic walking intervention
Youngblood, J. L.; Diot, C. M.; Norman, B. M.; Eldred, K.; Rande, A.; Dukelow, S. P.; Alazem, H.; McCormick, A.; Longmuir, P. E.; Shen, H.; Larkin-Kaiser, K. A.; Condliffe, E. G.
Show abstract
Purpose: To explore how 12-weeks of robotic walking impacts physical function and sequelae of inactivity for individuals with pediatric-onset neuromotor impairments. Methods: A single-arm mixed-methods interventional study examined robotic walking for 12-weeks in home and community settings, with 12-week follow-up. Outcomes included family goals (Goal Attainment Scale (GAS)) and perspectives (Interviews), postural control (Early Clinical Assessment of Balance), physical activity (Actigraphy, Habitual Activity Estimation Scale, Patient Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Physical Activity) and sequelae of inactivity (PROMIS Sleep Disturbances, Bowel Function Diary). GAS was collected pre-training, post-training, and 12-week follow-up. All other quantitative outcomes were collected every 4-weeks. Quantitative data are described with median (25th-75thpercentile) and analyzed using a Skillings-Mack test with post-hoc Wilcoxon Signed-Rank. Qualitative interviews were conducted before and after training and analyzed thematically. Results: 15 participants aged 4-23 completed this study. Participants had cerebral palsy (10/15) or rare genetic conditions (5/15), and most used a wheelchair in community settings. Postural control improved (test-statistic = 23.0, p<0.001) after 8 weeks (change=5.0(0.0-21.4), p=0.016) and was maintained through 12-week follow-up (change=13.7(3.1-23.7), p=0.008). Over half of the participants achieved goals (t-score > 50) after training. Exploratory analyses suggest improvements in sleep disturbance immediately after training (p=0.025) and 4-weeks after (p=0.047). All measures of physical activity did not improve. Parents reported improvements in walking, activities of daily living, and sequelae of inactivity (i.e., bowel function, appetite, and sleep). Conclusions: Improvements were seen across a range of measures and notably postural control improvements were maintained at the follow-up. Parents perceived improvements in physical function and activities of daily living. Future research is warranted to further understand the impacts of robotic walking for children and small adults with mobility impairments.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Postural control telerehabilitation with a low-cost virtual reality protocol for children with cerebral palsy: Protocol for a clinical trial 94%
- An inertial sensor-based comprehensive analysis of manual wheelchair user mobility during daily life in people with SCI 93%
- Randomized, Crossover Clinical Trial on the Safety, Feasibility, and Usability of the ABLE Exoskeleton: A Comparative Study with Knee-Ankle-Foot Orthoses 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using remotely delivered Spring Forest Qigong™ to reduce neuropathic pain in adults with spinal cord injury: A non-randomized controlled trial 91%
- Fall Injury Avoidance Strategy Scale (FIAS): Development and Validation of a Scale to Quantify Fall-Related Protective Movements 91%
- Quantifying Exercise Intensity to Predict Changes in Walking Capacity in People with Chronic Stroke 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effects of spinal stimulation and short-burst treadmill training on gait biomechanics in children with cerebral palsy 93%
- The importance of a consistent workflow to estimate muscle-tendon lengths based on joint angles from the conventional gait model 92%
- Clinical measures of balance and gait cannot differentiate somatosensory impairments in people with lower-limb amputation 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.