Back

Factors Associated with Relative Handgrip Strength among Medical Students in Serbia: An Exploratory Cross-Sectional Study

Stratakis, K.; Adrovic, D.; Terzic-Supic, Z.; Nikolov, Z.; Todorovic, J.

2026-08-27 sports medicine
10.64898/2026.08.24.26361230 medRxiv
Show abstract

Handgrip strength (HGS) is a practical measure of muscular strength, but the factors associated with relative HGS among young adults remain insufficiently understood. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined demographic and anthropometric characteristics, total physical activity (PA), and depressive symptoms in relation to relative HGS among medical students in Serbia. A total of 424 students from the Faculty of Medicine, University of Belgrade, completed HGS testing and study questionnaires. HGS was measured using a VALD DynaMo Lite dynamometer and expressed relative to body weight (N/kg). Participants were categorized according to sample-specific relative HGS percentiles: <25th, 25th to 75th, and >75th percentile. PA was assessed using the IPAQ-SF and depressive symptoms using the PHQ-9. Three pairwise multivariable logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with relative HGS categories. Sex and BMI were the most consistent correlates of relative HGS. Female students had lower odds of belonging to higher relative HGS categories, while higher BMI was consistently associated with lower odds of belonging to higher categories. Age was associated only with the 25th to 75th percentile group compared with the <25th percentile group. Total PA volume and PHQ-9 score were not independently associated with relative HGS categories. These findings suggest that relative HGS in this population was more strongly associated with demographic and anthropometric characteristics than with total self-reported PA or depressive symptom severity. Keywords: handgrip strength; relative handgrip strength; muscular strength; medical students; physical activity; depressive symptoms; body mass index

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.