Back

Genetic variation in behavioral and physiological responses to copper in Drosophila melanogaster

Zannat, M. M.; Jones, J. C.; Ridgway, M.; Everman, E. R.

2026-08-27 genetics
10.64898/2026.08.23.746539 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Anthropogenic copper (Cu) contamination from agriculture, mining, and industrial runoff creates environmental gradients affecting physiology and behavior in wild populations. While Cu toxicity in Drosophila melanogaster is well characterized, it remains unclear whether Cu resistance is one integrated trait or several independently evolving components. Using a subset of recombinant inbred lines (RILs) from the Drosophila Synthetic Population Resource (DSPR), we measured three components of Cu response: feeding avoidance, oviposition avoidance, and physiological tolerance (median lethal time, LT50) under sustained Cu exposure. All three traits showed substantial phenotypic variation among RILs. Feeding and oviposition avoidance were both highly heritable (H 2 ~ 0.88), and RIL identity accounted for 49.5% of the variance in LT50. However, the three traits showed no significant correlation across RILs, indicating distinct genetic architecture. We identified a single male specific quantitative trait locus (QTL) on chromosome 2R that explained 17.7% of the variation in feeding preference; the interval included candidate detoxification genes Jheh1, Jheh2, Jheh3 and sano, the latter of which is associated with olfactory behavior. No significant QTL were detected for oviposition preference, suggesting a highly polygenic structure that may difficult to detect with our limited panel size. Together, these results indicate that Cu resistance in D. melanogaster is genetically modular. Behavioral avoidance during feeding, oviposition, and physiological tolerance are heritable but architecturally distinct components, each with potential to respond to selection independently.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.