Back

Nutrient Availability Regulates an Exploration-Elaboration Trade-off in Fungal Rhizomorph Networks

Naeher, S. C.; Buehler, M. J.

2026-08-24 bioengineering
10.64898/2026.08.23.746505 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Rhizomorphs are specialised, root-like fungal structures whose hierarchical organisation may offer a route to reinforcing mycelium-based materials, yet the environmental regulation of their network formation remains poorly understood. Here, we develop an image-based framework to characterise the longitudinal growth and organisation of Armillaria gallica rhizomorphs under varying nutrient availability and light exposure. Time-lapse imaging was combined with image segmentation, skeleton-based network analysis, optical measurements and Gompertz growth modelling. Nutrient availability produced a distinctly non-monotonic response. Moderate nutrient limitation (0.5 x standard concentration) favoured rapid and coherent exploratory growth, whereas intermediate enrichment (1.5 x) produced the greatest eventual network extent, reaching approximately 975 mm total strand length; network extent and radial expansion differed significantly across nutrient levels (padj = 0.0012). Further enrichment maintained substantial fungal coverage without additional network elaboration, consistent with a shift from long-range exploration towards more locally consolidating growth. By contrast, exclusion of ambient light produced no significant differences after multiple-testing correction. These results reveal a resource-dependent trade-off between exploration and network elaboration, demonstrate that fungal coverage and organised network formation are distinct outcomes, and provide a quantitative basis for controlling self-organised biological architectures for bio-derived material design.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.