Normative modelling of cortical networks identifies subtypes of type 2 diabetes associated with distinct clinical and transcriptomic profiles
Wang, X.; Sun, Z.; Cao, J.; Liang, X.; Sun, L.; Tian, J.; Xia, M.; Zhao, L.; Qiu, S.; He, Y.
Show abstract
Type 2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by substantial clinical heterogeneity, yet its neurobiological substrates remain unclear. Here, we leverage normative modelling of cortical morphometric networks to quantify individual-level brain deviations using structural MRI data from 3,723 participants (1,941 T2D patients and 1,782 healthy controls) across three independent cohorts. Data-driven clustering reveals two robust T2D biotypes characterized by widespread positive (biotype 1) and negative (biotype 2) brain deviations. Despite comparable overall metabolic burdens, these biotypes feature distinct brain-metabolic coupling patterns: biotype 1 is primarily associated with lipid metabolism, whereas biotype 2 reflects a multifactorial metabolic burden spanning glycaemic control, adiposity, lipid, vascular risks, and disease duration. These divergent brain vulnerability profiles have distinct cognitive consequences; notably, biotype 2 shows poorer performance in complex cognitive tasks, aligning with negatively deviated connectivity gradients along the sensorimotor-to-association axis. Spatial transcriptomic analyses further link biotype 2 deviations to gene expression patterns enriched in insulin signalling, mitochondrial functions, tight junctions, and neurodegenerative disease pathways, alongside specific involvement of inhibitory neurons and oligodendrocyte lineage cells. Our findings provide a neurobiological understanding of T2D heterogeneity and establish a data-driven framework for characterizing personalized brain vulnerability, with implications for advancing precision diabetes medicine.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Explainable AI-based analysis of human pancreas sections identifies traits of type 2 diabetes 93%
- Characterizing spatiotemporal white matter hyperintensity pathophysiology in vivo to disentangle vascular and neurodegenerative contributions 92%
- Glycaemic variability underlies myocyte dysfunction and myocardial injury risk in diabetes 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The power of TOPMed imputation for the discovery of Latino enriched rare variants associated with type 2 diabetes 90%
- High-throughput Genetic Clustering of Type 2 Diabetes Loci Reveals Heterogeneous Mechanistic Pathways of Metabolic Disease 90%
- Discovery of biomarkers for glycaemic deterioration before and after the onset of type 2 diabetes: an overview of the data from the epidemiological studies within the IMI DIRECT Consortium 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Selective vulnerability and resilience to Alzheimer's disease tauopathy as a function of genes and the connectome 90%
- Educational attainment, structural brain reserve, and Alzheimer’s disease: a Mendelian randomization analysis 90%
- Whole-exome sequencing in 16,511 individuals reveals a role of the HTRA1 protease and its substrate EGFL8 in brain white matter hyperintensities 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Genomic Context Informed Genotype Data and Within-model Ancestry Adjustment to Classify Type 2 Diabetes 91%
- The Interpretable Multimodal Machine Learning (IMML) framework reveals pathological signatures of distal sensorimotor polyneuropathy 91%
- Complex patterns of multimorbidity associated with severe COVID-19 and Long COVID 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- AutoFocus: A hierarchical framework to explore multi-omic disease associations spanning multiple scales of biomolecular interaction 91%
- Reduced inhibition, bursting, and accelerated oscillations drive early hippocampal hyperactivity in Alzheimer's disease 90%
- Knockout of the longevity gene Klotho perturbs aging- and Alzheimer's disease-linked brain microRNAs and tRNA fragments 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.