Back

Active control modulates memory-related activity during encoding and encoding-retrieval similarity

Ding, Z.; Yuan, S.; Xu, J.; Zhang, S.; Hanslmayr, S.; Liu, X.; Zhang, M.

2026-08-27 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.23.746434 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Self-directed learning allows learners to actively control their learning experience and has been shown to enhance memory compared with matched yoked learning. However, it remains unclear when and how active control modulates memory-related neural activity during learning and retrieval. We recorded electroencephalography (EEG) while participants encoded objects under active and yoked learning conditions and again during a delayed recognition test approximately 24 h later. We examined event-related potential (ERP) activity across earlier processing windows, including pre-stimulus slow potentials and early N2 activity, and later processing windows, including P300, late slow-wave, and post-stimulus slow-potential activity. We also examined encoding-retrieval similarity (ERS) between neural patterns during encoding and retrieval. Behaviorally, active control improved delayed recognition, with the advantage selectively expressed in detailed recognition. In the ERP analyses, earlier processing windows showed memory-related effects, with pre-stimulus slow-potential and N2 activity differentiating subsequently remembered from forgotten items, but were not modulated by active control. By contrast, active control modulated later memory-related ERP activity, with remembered-forgotten differences expressed during late stimulus-related and immediate post-stimulus processing only in the active condition. ERS showed a similar active-control modulation: memory-related encoding-retrieval pattern similarity was evident under active learning, but not under yoked learning, with this effect involving relatively late encoding and retrieval windows. Together, these findings support a constructive-processing account, suggesting that memory formation under active control depends more strongly on rich, detailed encoding representations that can be reinstated during retrieval.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.