Back

A multi-tissue epigenomic atlas links the sheep non-coding genome to domestication and complex traits

Meng, Z.; Zhang, S.; Zhuang, Z.; He, J.; Liu, F.; Wu, L.; Sun, X.; Lu, J.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Gong, M.; Du, X.; Mei, Q.; Li, H.; Zhang, G.; He, X.; He, J.; Guo, X.; Nie, S.; Zhang, X.; Shan, M.; Yang, J.; Li, X.; Yang, H.; Hu, Y.; He, Y.; Tian, S.; Wu, X.; Wu, X.; Zhan, K.; Wang, M.; Lu, X.; Zhou, H.; Zhao, G.; Zhao, P.; Ling, Y.; Ren, C.; Yang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Jiang, Y.; Wu, W.; Xiang, R.; Crooijmans, R. P. M. A.; Madsen, O.; MacHugh, D. E.; Daly, K. G.; Clark, E. L.; Fang, L.; Zhang, Z.; Chu, M.; Guan, D.; Pan, Z.

2026-08-26 genetics
10.64898/2026.08.22.746371 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Non-coding regulatory variation drives complex traits, domestication, and evolutionary adaptation, yet the sheep genome lacks high-resolution functional annotation. Here we present SheepEpimap, a multi-tissue regulatory atlas harmonizing 516 CUT&Tag histone modifications, ATAC-seq, and RNA-seq datasets across 43 adult tissues in sheep. We annotated 2.93 million cis-regulatory elements, yielding 557,441 enhancer-gene pairs and 145,407 variants with allele-specific effects. By training a sequence-to-function deep-learning model, we decoded the base-pair syntax of chromatin accessibility, annotated transcription factor motif instances genome-wide, and constructed 12,210 tissue-specific gene regulatory networks (GRNs). Integrating this resource with multi-tissue expression quantitative trait loci, selection sweeps, and genome-wide association studies prioritized non-coding variants driving domestication and complex traits. Finally, cross-species analysis revealed that sequence-conserved, tissue-matched enhancers were significantly enriched in the heritability of complex traits and diseases in humans. In summary, SheepEpimap (https://genome.ucsc.edu/s/mengzhu/SheepEpimap) provides an open-access foundational ecosystem for sheep functional genomics, precision breeding, and comparative biology.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.