Symmetry-Based Center and Rotation Refinement for Fiber Diffraction Patterns
Klein, I.; Agam, G.; Irving, T.
Show abstract
X-ray fiber diffraction patterns exhibit four-fold symmetry that can be exploited, through folding and averaging, to improve signal-to-noise ratio. Accurate folding requires a precise sub-pixel estimate of the symmetry center and precise orientation of the meridional pattern axis to the fiber axis: small center or angular errors blur diffraction features, reduce layer-line sharpness, and introduce errors in spacing measurements. A pixel-level estimate is often too imprecise for this purpose, and detector gaps further complicate the alignment objective. We formulate the masked quadrant-folding problem, define a four-quadrant symmetry loss that consistently excludes invalid pixels, and evaluate several refinement strategies: hierarchical coarse-to-fine grid search; ECC-based rigid registration with global center/orientation correction fitting; ECC registration followed by local gradient refinement; and a hybrid that appends a local grid search on a cropped pattern. Direct gradient optimization from the rough QF alignment was found to be unreliable. Grid search provides a robust, interpretable baseline that directly minimizes the folding objective but is substantially slower than registration; ECC gives a fast near-correct alignment, and the hybrid closes the accuracy gap to brute-force search at a fraction of its runtime. On real datasets with calibration data, applying a calibration center with optimized rotation is effectively optimal. The hybrid center-refinement method has been integrated into the MuscleX package.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- CryoEM single particle reconstruction with a complex-valued particle stack 94%
- Automated methods for 3D Segmentation of Focused Ion Beam-Scanning Electron Microscopic Images 94%
- Miffi: Improving the accuracy of CNN-based cryo-EM micrograph filtering with fine-tuning and Fourier space information 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.