Back

Effects of Adolescent Parenting Styles on Adult Cardiovascular Conditions: A Population-Based Cohort Study

Noor, N.; Jackisch, J.; Baggio, S.; Cullati, S.; Carmeli, C.

2026-08-25 epidemiology
10.64898/2026.08.22.26361103 medRxiv
Show abstract

Purpose: Family-based interventions are proposed for primordial cardiovascular disease (CVD) prevention, yet which family-environment components to target remains unclear. We quantified effects of parenting styles in adolescence on adult cardiovascular conditions, including hypertension, and whether effects differ by family financial hardship. Methods: Data were from the US National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health (n=4,050). Parenting styles were derived via latent class analysis of adolescent-reported parental responsiveness and demandingness (ages 12-19, 1994-1995). Family financial hardship was based on parent-reported ability to pay bills. CVD and hypertension were assessed via biomarkers and self-report (ages 33-43, 2016-2018). Confounding factors were selected based on a directed acyclic graph; risk differences were estimated using doubly robust inverse-probability-weighted models. Results: Three parenting styles emerged: authoritative (11.1%), permissive (77.9%), and indifferent (11.0%). After 21 years, 33.0% had CVD or hypertension. Whole-population risk differences for permissive and indifferent versus authoritative parenting were -1.0% (95% CI: -5.3, 3.3%) and -1.8% (95% CI: -7.8, 4.2%), respectively. Among families reporting financial hardship, permissive parenting had lower risk (-15.9%, 95%CI: -28.4%, -3.3%), though inconsistent across sensitivity analyses. Conclusions: Adolescent parenting styles had small estimated long-term cardiovascular effects, with no robust evidence of differences by financial hardship.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.