Evaluating cranial electrotherapy stimulation for anxiety associated with breathlessness in palliative care: a mixed-methods feasibility study
Bleazard, L.; Copping, S. R.; Booth, S.; Gray, L. J.; Faull, C.; Walker, K.; Griffiths, C.; Wenzel, D.
Show abstract
Objectives To explore the acceptability and tolerability of cranial electrotherapy stimulation (CES) using Alpha-Stim AID as a potential intervention for anxiety associated with breathlessness in people with advanced chronic respiratory disease. Methods A multicentre, mixed-methods, non-randomised interventional feasibility study with a parallel usual-care control group. Participants were adults with chronic respiratory disease and significant anxiety and breathlessness symptoms (assessed via Integrated Palliative Outcome Scale) receiving care from hospice services. The intervention groups used Alpha-Stim AID for eight weeks either at a fixed or personalised dose, followed by a four-week follow-up period. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Results 12.5% of screened patients at the primary site were eligible, and 29 unique participants were recruited. Three participants withdrew from the study (10.3%), none of which were attributable to CES. Most adverse events were mild, with headache reported frequently across control and intervention groups. Outcome measure completion was high, with data missingness below 6.4%. Numerical rating scales of anxiety and breathlessness fluctuated daily and remained broadly static, whereas GAD-7 scores assessing anxiety improved over time across all groups. This feasibility study was not powered to assess clinical efficacy. Conclusion CES using Alpha-Stim AID was deliverable within hospice services and was generally acceptable and tolerable among participants who enrolled. Our findings support further evaluation which should involve a fully-powered randomised controlled trial against a sham device to determine whether CES provides clinically meaningful improvements in anxiety for this patient population.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Response and role of palliative care during the COVID-19 pandemic: a national telephone survey of hospices in Italy 91%
- Defining and measuring unmet palliative care needs among people with life-limiting illness: a scoping review of international evidence 91%
- Models, components, and outcomes of palliative and end-of-life care provided to adults living at home: A systematic review of reviews 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Core Outcome Set to evaluate the impact of prognostication in people living with advanced cancer: an international consensus study 90%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 90%
- Physician estimates of the feasibility of preserving the dying for future revival 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- HEART rate variability biofeedback for LOng Covid symptoms (HEARTLOC): protocol for a feasibility study 92%
- A text messaging intervention to support patients with chronic pain during prescription opioid tapering: protocol for a double-blind randomised controlled trial 91%
- Tracking Persistent Symptoms in Scotland (TraPSS): A Longitudinal Prospective Cohort Study of COVID-19 Recovery After Mild Acute Infection 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Enhancing Palliative Care Registration Using an Automated Robotic Process with Clinician Validation: A PRADA Prospective Cohort Study. 90%
- Community end-of-life care during the COVID-19 pandemic: Initial findings of a UK primary care survey 88%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital Health Interventions in Palliative Care: A Systematic Meta-Review and Evidence Synthesis 93%
- Digital Health Tools for the Passive Monitoring of Depression: A Systematic Review of Methods 90%
- Natural Language Processing Techniques to Detect Delirium in Hospitalized Patients from Clinical Notes: A Systematic Review 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.