Sampling of the Lung Microbiome in Patients Undergoing Lung Resection
Pohlman, A.; Marten, A.; Fontest Noronha, M.; Khemmani, M.; Wolfe, A. J.; Abdelsattar, Z. M.
Show abstract
Background: Although the lung is of low biomass, it harbors a diverse and dynamic microbiome that may influence disease and healing. Existing studies have used diverse sampling methods with high propensities for contamination and sampling error, leading to diverse and unclear results. Here, we characterized the lung microbiome via airway and parenchymal samples to determine variation across patients and sampling methods. Methods: We recruited adult patients undergoing lung resection for suspected or confirmed malignancy. After resection and under sterile conditions, a 1 cm cubic piece of non-cancerous lung parenchyma and a swab from the specimen's bronchus were collected and sent for microbiome analysis via 16S rRNA gene amplicon (V4) sequencing on an Illumina platform. An established bioinformatics pipeline was used to determine taxonomic identification. Baseline clinical and demographic data were compared to microbiome composition. Results: A total of 86 patients were included in the study. Beta diversity (microbial composition) varied significantly by sampling method (biopsy of lung parenchyma versus airway swabs), so all further results were analyzed within sample types. Further analyses revealed significant differences in beta diversity by lobe of the lung, indicating a different microbial composition by anatomic location. Analyses of patient demographics revealed significant differences by age and comorbidities, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation. Conclusions: The lung harbors a diverse microbiome that differs by anatomic location and patient characteristics. This study provides a framework for more accurate future lung microbiome sampling and characterization.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The respiratory virome and exacerbations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease 93%
- Assessment of two DNA extraction kits for profiling poultry respiratory microbiota from multiple sample types 91%
- Oral feeding with probiotic Lactobacillus rhamnosus attenuates cigarette smoke-induced COPD in C57Bl/6 mice: Relevance to inflammatory markers in human bronchial epithelial cells 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimisation of DNA extraction from nasal lining fluid to assess the nasal microbiome using third-generation sequencing 93%
- Cryobanking of human distal lung epithelial cells for preservation of their phenotypic and functional characteristics. 89%
- Targeting ATP12A, a non-gastric proton pump alpha subunit, for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis treatment 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the feasibility, sensitivity, and specificity of next-generation molecular methods for pleural infection diagnosis 92%
- Cerebrospinal fluids from healthy pregnant women does not harbor a detectable microbial community 90%
- Low diversity and instability of the sinus microbiota over time in adults with cystic fibrosis 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Epithelial Remodeling And Microbial Dysbiosis In The Lower Respiratory Tract Of Vitamin A-Deficient Mouse Lungs 91%
- Dysbiosis and structural disruption of the respiratory microbiota in COVID-19 patients with severe and fatal outcomes 90%
- Manually weighted taxonomy classifiers improve species-specific rumen microbiome analysis compared to unweighted or average weighted taxonomy classifiers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metagenomic identification of severe pneumonia pathogens with rapid Nanopore sequencing in mechanically-ventilated patients. 92%
- Longitudinal Dynamics and Site-Specific Recovery of the Human Respiratory Microbiome Following Smoking Cessation 92%
- Responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD is associated with changes in microbiota 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.