Back

Phase-resolved transcriptomic bottlenecks in peptide cancer vaccine response

Goldman, C. K.

2026-08-26 immunology
10.64898/2026.08.21.746349 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Background: Peptide cancer vaccines can elicit antigen-specific immunity, but peripheral immunogenicity often does not translate into durable tumor control. Methods: We analyzed transcriptomic profiles across three public human peptide-vaccine cohorts: C1/GSE278476, a MUC1 plus Poly-ICLC PBMC RNA-seq cohort with ordered anti-MUC1 IgG response classes; C2/GSE85698, manufactured dendritic-cell vaccine preparations linked to TARP ELISpot response; and C3/GSE53922, baseline PBMC expression linked to overall survival after personalized peptide vaccination in castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prespecified gene modules were summarized as mean standardized scores and tested with endpoint-appropriate cohort-level models with within-family FDR control. Results: Baseline immune-readiness was favorable in C1 (beta=0.301, p=0.0072, q=0.093; permutation p=0.0088) and associated with longer survival in C3 (HR=0.662, 95% CI 0.532-0.823, p=0.000206, q=0.00126). Baseline erythroid/inflammatory drag showed the opposite direction in C1 (beta=-0.258, p=0.031, q=0.202; permutation p=0.0324) and was associated with inferior survival in C3 (HR=1.390, 95% CI 1.181-1.636, p=0.0000755, q=0.000982). In C2, lower tolerogenic/myeloid dendritic-cell product-state expression was observed in strong ELISpot responders (8/19 focused genes q<0.05). At C1 week 2, a priming/costimulation/mTOR-AKT module showed an FDR-significant cross-sectional association with response class (permutation p=0.0026), but paired within-person change was not significant. Conclusions: Public peptide-vaccine transcriptomic data support a phase-linked model in which host readiness, erythroid/inflammatory drag, dendritic-cell product state, and early priming are measurable response-linked layers. These retrospective cohorts do not establish causality, biomarker status, clinical utility, or durable tumor control.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.