Back

Direct visualization of MCM helicase activation and replisome coupling in situ

Zinder, O. J.; Zahringer, J.; Polasek-Sedlackova, H.; Prasanth, K. V.; Ha, T.; Prasanth, S. G.

2026-08-24 cell biology
10.64898/2026.08.21.746258 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Deciphering the spatial organization of molecular machines that copy the genome remains a fundamental challenge in biology. Essential for eukaryotic DNA replication, Mini-Chromosome Maintenance (MCM2-7) helicases are loaded during G1 as double hexamers (DHs) to license replication origins. Upon activation in S phase, each DH is thought to split into two single hexamers (SHs) that form the active CMG helicases and travel bidirectionally. However, the field has long been divided: biochemical and structural studies define CMG helicases as autonomous, independent motors, while genomic and cellular imaging assays suggest sister replisomes remain physically coupled within replication factories. Here, we use MINFLUX nanoscopy to localize individual MCM complexes down to nanometer precision in situ, directly resolving DHs in human cells and capturing their separation into SHs upon origin firing. We find that the resulting sister replisomes do not diffuse apart: they remain coupled at a characteristic distance of ~40 nm throughout S phase. Depletion experiments identify two distinct contributions to this coupling: local, protein-mediated tethering by the AND1 scaffold, and higher-order spatial confinement dependent on cohesin, which is dispensable for MCM loading in G1 but required to maintain coupling in S phase. By linking the nanometer-scale architecture of the replisome to the genome-wide topology of replication fountains, these findings provide direct spatial evidence that sister forks are coupled during DNA synthesis and define the molecular forces that organize replisomes within their native nuclear context.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.