Back

Stationary phase KCl levels trigger changes in Dps conformation to facilitate its partitioning between reversibly-aggregated deposits and Dps-DNA condensates

Mahajan, M.; Gupta, A.; Guptasarma, P.

2026-08-26 biophysics
10.64898/2026.08.21.746236 bioRxiv
Show abstract

In E. coli populations subjected to starvation, the transition of cells into stationary-phase is characterized by reduced KCl levels, cytoplasmic acidification, and increased production of Dps, the DNA binding protein from starved cells. Here, we show that at KCl concentrations peculiar to the stationary-phase, Dps displays greater surface hydrophobicity, lower helical content, lower stability to denaturation, greater susceptibility to proteolysis, and an intriguing ability to undergo 'reversible' deposition into liquid-solid phase separated (LSPS) aggregates, when no DNA is present. Whereas we have already previously shown that, at growth-phase KCl concentrations, Dps either remains soluble or forms liquid-liquid phase separated (LLPS) condensates with DNA, when DNA is present, here we show that the coacervation of Dps with DNA is exacerbated by stationary-phase KCl concentrations. This leads us to suggest the following interesting possibilities: (i) newly-produced Dps is reversibly kinetically-partitioned between LSPS and LLPS states, at low KCl concentrations, depending on the availability of DNA; (ii) excess Dps that is not coacervated with DNA in the LSPS state, exists in the LSPS state at low KCl concentrations; and (iii) Dps in the LSPS state dissolves to become instantaneously available for the packaging of newly-produced DNA, once nutrition becomes available, growth resumes and cytoplasmic KCl concentrations rise, before there is any production of the growth-phase DNA-packaging protein, HU.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.