Back

Novel, highly divergent clones in Listeria monocytogenes serotype 4b in North America: Sublineages 782 and 1039, members of the hypervirulent clonal complex 2

Brown, P. E.; Kucerova, Z.; Perot, P.; Sadat, A.; Jackson, J. H.; Elhanafi, D.; Gadin, E.; Lecuit, M.; Kathariou, S.

2026-08-24 microbiology
10.64898/2026.08.21.744909 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Listeria monocytogenes is a Gram-positive bacterial foodborne pathogen responsible for the severe illness listeriosis. Of the 14 L. monocytogenes serotypes, serotype 4b is a major contributor to human listeriosis and encompasses all four leading hypervirulent clonal complexes (CCs), including the ancient, ubiquitous CC2. CC2 is globally dominated by sublineage (SL) 2, responsible for most human CC2-associated cases. Here we describe two other CC2 SLs, SLs 782 and 1039. These SLs are newly recognized, having been reported only since 2002, and to date are encountered exclusively in North America. Phylogenetic analysis revealed that they are strikingly divergent from each other as well as from SL2. SL782 and SL1039 have been implicated in human listeriosis and have also been repeatedly isolated from surface water and wildlife in North America, with several of these environmental strains exhibiting high genomic similarity ([≤]7 core genome allelic mismatches) to strains from human listeriosis. They share an unusual resistance profile towards a panel of Listeria wide-host-range-phages and exhibit several distinct lineage-specific traits. Specifically, SL782 universally lacks a gene otherwise unique to and conserved in serotype 4b and harbors the Listeria pathogenicity island LIPI-4, while SL1039 harbors LIPI-3 and is almost always resistant to tetracycline, harboring the novel Tn916-like transposon Tn916.1039. These and other traits may have driven clonal emergence of SL782 and SL1039, potentially via adaptations in natural ecosystems.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.