Quantifying Blood Culture Volume Using an Automated System: Insights from Pediatric and Adult Simulated Collections Using BACTEC FXI
Turner, D.; Herr, J.
Show abstract
Objectives: Capturing adequate blood volume for blood cultures is critical for accurate detection of bloodstream infections. Pediatric volume targets vary by age and weight, whereas adult targets are standardized. The BD BACTEC FXI Culture System (FXI) contains an integrated calibrated load cell capable of automatically reporting blood volume measurements for each vial loaded onto the system. This study evaluated the accuracy of the FXI's blood volume measurements in simulated pediatric and adult patients. Methods: Mock pediatric and adult blood draws were performed, using bagged whole blood, to replicate real-world collection protocols. Syringe-collected blood volumes ranged from 2.0 to 15.0 mL for pediatric patients, depending on mock patient weight, and were fixed at 40.0 mL for adults. Samples were inoculated into BD BACTEC Peds Plus/F, Plus Aerobic/F, and Lytic/10 Anaerobic/F Culture Vials, with a target volume of 2.0 to 10.0 mL per bottle. Reference blood volumes were determined gravimetrically using manually obtained pre- and post-inoculation weights with a blood-specific gravity of 1.055 g/mL and were compared to the automatically measured, gravimetric-based blood volumes reported by the BACTEC FXI Culture System. Results: Automated volume estimates were accurate to a mean error of -0.03 mL per bottle (SD, 0.40 mL; n=168; 95% CI, -0.09 mL, 0.03 mL) and -0.08 mL (SD, 0.79 mL; n=72; 95% CI, -0.26 mL, 0.10 mL) when assessing total volume collected per patient. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that the automated system can quantify blood volumes in BACTEC culture vials and support blood volume monitoring for pediatric and adult collections. The gravimetric approach is also amenable to full automation for efficient and accurate blood volume determination.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of performance of two SARS-CoV-2 Rapid whole-blood finger-stick IgM-IgGCombined Antibody Tests 94%
- Comparison of haemoglobin concentration measurements using HemoCue-301 and Sysmex XN-Series 1500: a survey among anaemic Gambian infants aged 6-12 months 92%
- Pathogen Reduction Of SARS-CoV-2 Virus In Plasma And Whole Blood Using Riboflavin And UV Light 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Immune Profiling Panel: a proof of concept study of a new multiplex molecular tool to assess the immune status of critically-ill patients 90%
- Performance characteristics of a rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay at a public plaza testing site in San Francisco 90%
- Suboptimal biological sampling as a probable cause of false-negative COVID-19 diagnostic test results 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Clinical evaluation of a SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay on a fully automated system for rapid on-demand testing in the hospital setting 92%
- Pushing beyond specifications: Evaluation of linearity and clinical performance of a fully automated SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR assay for reliable quantification in blood and other materials outside recommendations 91%
- SARS-CoV-2 sample-to-answer nucleic acid testing in a tertiary care emergency department: evaluation and utility 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.