Tolerance for Adverse Events from Operative and Nonoperative Treatment for Mild Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy
Arkam, F.; Goldstein, E.; Zeng, X.; Yakdan, S.; Badhiwala, J.; Chan, A. K.; Cheng, A. L.; Chou, D.; Colman, M.; Ghogawala, Z.; Godzik, J.; Kelly, M. P.; Mroz, T. E.; Orosz, L.; Park, P.; Patel, A. A.; Potts, E. A.; Schechtman, K. B.; Steinmetz, M. P.; Xiong, G. X.; Zhang, L.; Neuman, B. J.; Sasso, R. C.; Rhee, J.; Ray, W. Z.; Greenberg, J. K.; Politi, M. C.
Show abstract
Background. Guidelines recommend surgery for moderate and severe cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) but support either surgery or nonoperative care for mild disease. How patients weigh the adverse events associated with each pathway is not well characterized. Methods. We conducted a three-arm randomized vignette experiment among United States adults aged 40 years and older recruited through an online research panel. All participants read an identical description of mild CSM and were randomized to one of three scenarios: surgery that improved symptoms, surgery that halted progression without improvement, or nonoperative management with symptom progression. Participants in the surgical scenarios rated 12 possible complications and those in the nonoperative scenario rated 8 progression outcomes. For each item, participants rated how strongly it would influence their decision (0-10) and whether they would still choose the same treatment. Items for which participants would no longer choose the same treatment were termed dominant decision factors. Results. Of 276 respondents, 263 (95.2%) were analyzed. Dominant factor rates ranged from 13.5% to 87.8% across complications. Complications described as persisting at one year produced substantially higher rates than the same complications described as resolving by three months. Adverse events more frequently constituted dominant factors when surgery was framed as offering less benefit, although differences between scenarios were not statistically significant. In the nonoperative scenario, worsening bladder control (56.6%) and neck pain interfering with sleep (53.0%) were the strongest influences, exceeding needing a cane to walk (32.1%). Conclusions. Treatment decisions for mild CSM are driven primarily by the expected permanence of adverse events and their anticipated impact on daily quality of life, rather than by conventional neurological metrics or surgical benefit framing.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The perception of individuals with low back pain regarding reassuring information: insights based on physiotherapists messages 92%
- The role of Patient and Public Involvement (PPI) in pre-clinical spinal cord research: an interview study 91%
- UK osteopathic practice in 2019: a retrospective analysis of practice data 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Study of Patients undergoing Trigger Finger Release Surgery in a Primary Care setting – Organisational Capabilities, Outcomes and Benefits 89%
- Patients’ perspectives on ecologically sustainable healthcare in general practice 88%
- Drug treatments affecting ACE2 in COVID-19 infection: a systematic review protocol 87%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of Operative Time and Blood Loss with the FFX(R) Device Versus Pedicle Screw Fixation During Surgery for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Retrospective Cohort Study 90%
- Navigating the Crisis: A Cross-sectional Survey Analysis of Resident Doctors' Experiences of Specialty Training and Employment in Today's NHS 89%
- Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Versus Ultrasound Therapy for Plantar Fasciitis: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The long-term impact of vaginal surgical mesh devices in UK primary care: a cohort study in the CPRD 89%
- Machine learning model predicts new-onset deep vein thrombosis of the lower extremities after pelvic floor fracture surgery and targeted diagnosis 88%
- Is age the most important risk factor in COVID-19 patients? The relevance of comorbidity burden: A retrospective analysis of 10,090 hospitalizations 85%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.