Recognition of Category A bioterrorism agent syndromes by final-year medical students in the UK: a pilot study
Armitage, R. C.; Hammer, C. C.
Show abstract
Background Early recognition of presentations consistent with the deliberate release of a Category A bioterrorism agent is essential for rapid isolation, public health notification, and containment. The ability of UK clinicians-in-training to recognise these syndromes is unstudied. This pilot assessed final-year UK medical students' ability to recognise these syndromes. Methods A pilot cross-sectional online survey of final-year UK medical students used single-best-answer clinical vignettes depicting syndromes associated with Category A bioterrorism agents (BT vignettes) and clinically overlapping non-bioterrorism syndromes (NBT vignettes). Performance was summarised as the proportion of vignettes correctly identified, with primary analysis comparing within-participant BT and NBT performance. Results Twenty-five participants completed the survey. Participants performed worse on BT vignettes (M = 0.55) than on NBT vignettes (M = 0.81), with a within-participant difference of -0.26 (95% CI [-0.35, -0.18]; t(24) = -6.33, p < 0.001; Cohen's dz = -1.27). Botulism (96.0%) and Ebola virus disease (88.0%) were recognised by most participants, while anthrax (40.0%), pneumonic plague (28.0%), and smallpox (24.0%) were recognised by fewer than half. Conclusion This pilot provides the first UK evidence of a substantial diagnostic deficit in final-year medical students' recognition of Category A bioterrorism agent syndromes.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Learning about COVID-19 across borders: Public health information and adherence among international travellers to the UK 92%
- Public health information on COVID-19 for international travellers: Lessons learned from a rapid mixed-method evaluation in the UK containment phase 91%
- Implementing psychology-based Empathetic Refutational Interview training to support vaccine confident conversations for health workers 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key topics in pandemic health risk communication: A qualitative study of expert opinions and knowledge 90%
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 89%
- Sickness Absence Rates in NHS England Staff during the COVID-19 Pandemic: insights from multivariate regression and time series modelling 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- International healthcare workers’ experiences and perceptions of the 2022 multi-country mpox outbreak 91%
- Navigating vaccination choices: The intersecting dynamics of institutional trust, belonging and message perception among Congolese migrants in the UK (A reflexive thematic analysis) 89%
- How does policy modelling work in practice? A global analysis on the use of epidemiological modelling in health crises 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Improving modelling for epidemic responses: reflections from members of the UK infectious disease modelling community on their experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic 91%
- Impact of baseline cases of cough and fever on UK COVID-19 diagnostic testing rates: estimates from the Bug Watch community cohort study 88%
- TRACKing Excess Deaths (TRACKED): an interactive online tool to monitor excess deaths associated with COVID-19 pandemic in the United Kingdom 87%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.