Baseline Statin Exposure and Incident Acute Myocardial Infarction in Adults Aged >=75 Years Without Prior Cardiovascular Disease: A Population-Based Cohort Study
Cardenas-Valladolid, J.; Alonso-del Cura, O.; Beneito-Dura, M.; Somolinos-Simon, F. J.; Mostaza, J. M.; La Hoz, C.; San Andres-Rebollo, F. J.; Vich-Perez, P.; Gonzalez-Gonzalez, A. I.; Salinero-Fort, M. A.
Show abstract
Background: Adults aged [≥]75 years represent a rapidly growing population at risk of acute myocardial infarction (AMI), yet they remain markedly underrepresented in statin trials for primary prevention. The limited evidence base, together with multimorbidity, functional heterogeneity, and competing mortality risks, has contributed to uncertainty regarding the potential role of statins in very old adults. This study evaluated the association between baseline statin exposure and incident AMI among community-dwelling adults aged [≥]75 years without prior cardiovascular disease. Methods: We conducted a retrospective population-based cohort study using linked primary-care, hospital, laboratory, and pharmacy dispensing data from the Community of Madrid. Statin exposure was ascertained during a 24-month exposure-assessment period from 1 January 2018 to 31 December 2019 and classified at a landmark date of 1 January 2020, when outcome follow-up began. Participants were classified as exposed if they had received at least two statin dispensations during the exposure-assessment period and had no record of prior lipid-lowering therapy before 2018. Individuals with prior cardiovascular disease, type 1 diabetes, cancer, dementia, or advanced chronic kidney disease were excluded. Missing data were addressed using multiple imputation. The association between baseline statin exposure and incident AMI was estimated using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression. Propensity-score matching and Fine-Gray competing-risk regression, with all-cause mortality as the competing event, were performed as sensitivity analyses. Results: Among 174,014 individuals included in the final cohort, 32,698 (18.8%) met the criteria for baseline statin exposure. The mean age was 82.5 years. During a median follow-up of 5 years, AMI occurred in 533 (1.63%) statin-exposed individuals and 2722 (1.93%) non-exposed individuals (p=0.0003). The observed absolute risk difference was 0.30 percentage points (95% CI, 0.14-0.45), corresponding to an estimated observational number needed to treat of 338 over 5 years (95% CI, 222-708). In the fully adjusted Cox model, baseline statin exposure was associated with a lower risk of incident AMI (HR, 0.805; 95% CI, 0.731-0.887). In the full-cohort Fine-Gray model accounting for competing mortality, baseline statin exposure remained associated with a lower cumulative incidence of AMI (sHR, 0.823; 95% CI, 0.748-0.905). After propensity-score matching, the association remained in the competing-risk analysis (subdistribution HR, 0.852; 95% CI, 0.738-0.983). Conclusions: In this large population-based cohort of adults aged [≥]75 years without prior cardiovascular disease, baseline statin exposure was associated with a lower incidence of AMI across several analytical approaches. The observed absolute risk difference was modest, and the findings should be interpreted in light of the observational design, residual confounding, and the potential for selection related to survival to the landmark date. Further randomized evidence is needed to determine whether this association reflects a causal effect of statin therapy in very old adults. Keywords: Statins; primary prevention; acute myocardial infarction; aged [≥]75 years; landmark analysis; competing risks; propensity-score matching; real-world data.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Longitudinal associations of sustained low or high income and income variability with incident cardiovascular disease in individuals with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective population-based cohort study 93%
- Lipoprotein(a) and cardiovascular disease: prediction, attributable risk fraction and estimating benefits from novel interventions 93%
- Development and validation of a risk prediction algorithm for high-risk populations combining genetic and conventional risk factors of cardiovascular disease 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Walking pace optimizes conventional cardiovascular disease risk prediction models among vulnerable subpopulations: a prospective cohort study 93%
- Association of Cardiologist Clinic Visits with Cardiovascular Primary Prevention Outcomes Among People with HIV from Underrepresented Racial and Ethnic Groups in the Southern United States 93%
- State-level structural racism and incident coronary heart disease 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Differential impact of Covid-19 on incidence of diabetes mellitus and cardiovascular diseases in acute, post-acute and long Covid-19: population-based cohort study in the United Kingdom 92%
- Sociodemographic Characteristics and Longitudinal Progression of Multimorbidity: A Multistate Modelling Analysis of a Large Primary Care Records Dataset in England 92%
- Genetic associations of adult height with risk of cardioembolic and other subtypes of ischaemic stroke: a Mendelian randomisation study in multiple ancestries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of antithrombotic use and COVID-19 outcomes in a nationwide atrial fibrillation cohort 91%
- Predicting the risk of motor vehicle crash in the first year after cardioverter-defibrillator implantation 90%
- Place and causes of acute cardiovascular mortality during the COVID19 pandemic: retrospective cohort study of 580,972 deaths in England and Wales, 2014 to 2020 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Systolic Blood Pressure and Survival to Very Old Age. Results from the Women’s Health Initiative 92%
- Genetically Predicted IL-18 Inhibition and Risk of Cardiovascular Events: A Mendelian Randomization Study 91%
- Mitochondrial DNA copy number and incident heart failure: the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.