Transcranial alternating current stimulation for Parkinson's disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of motor outcomes
Mai, T. T.; Gjishti, T.; Witt, K.; Roheger, M.; Herrmann, C. S.
Show abstract
Transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS) is a promising noninvasive intervention for modulating pathological brain oscillations in Parkinson's disease (PD). To evaluate its clinical and neurophysiological efficacy, we searched five databases (Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar and APA PsycInfo) up to August 31, 2025, for trials employing tACS in patients with idiopathic PD. Risk of bias was assessed using the RoB 2 and ROBINS-I tools. Random-effects meta-analyses were used to calculate standardized (SMD) and unstandardized mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). We included 10 studies (184 patients with PD, mean age: 64.9, mean disease duration: 5.2 years) in the qualitative review and seven trials (146 patients with PD, mean age: 65.6, mean disease duration: 5 years) in the meta-analysis. No statistically significant differences favoring active tACS over control were found in overall motor severity (UPDRS: SMD = 0.21, 95% CI [-0.10, 0.52], p = 0.097), tremor (SMD = -0.40, 95% CI [-1.97, 1.17], p = 0.478), or a neurophysiological marker of inhibitory response, represented by short intracortical inhibition (MD = 0.00, 95% CI [-0.40, 0.41], p = 0.971). The prediction intervals indicated substantial uncertainty, and significant between-study heterogeneity was observed, particularly for tremor outcomes (I2 = 86.1%). This variability and limitation in evidence quality is largely driven by small sample sizes, highly heterogeneous stimulation protocols, and varying outcome assessments. Systematically, tACS was generally well-tolerated, with no serious adverse events reported across the included studies; however, formal safety assessment was beyond the scope of this review. Current exploratory evidence shows a lack of consistent improvements in motor symptoms or functions in PD largely due to protocol-level heterogeneity. Future studies should consistently assess the MDS-UPDRS III post-tACS and report its specific subscores alongside neurophysiological measures to enable robust meta-analyses.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Transcranial Pulse Stimulation Enhances Dexterity in Parkinson's Disease: A Randomized Sham-Controlled Clinical Trial 96%
- Corticospinal suppression underlying intact movement preparation fades in late Parkinson’s disease 93%
- High-frequency oscillations in the internal globus pallidus: a pathophysiological biomarker in Parkinson's disease? 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Magnetoencephalography-based prediction of longitudinal symptom progression in Parkinson's disease 93%
- Genome-wide association study of copy number variations in Parkinson's disease 92%
- Long-term effects of directional deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease: a randomized clinical trial on motor and non-motor symptoms 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- A Pilot Interventional Study on Feasibility and Effectiveness of the CUE1 device in Parkinson’s disease 92%
- Physiological effects of dual target DBS in an individual with Parkinson’s Disease and a sensing-enabled pulse generator 92%
- A validated measure of rigidity in Parkinson's Disease using alternating finger tapping on an engineered keyboard 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cortico-Cortical Paired Associative Stimulation Increases SMA-M1 Facilitation in Tremor-Dominant Parkinsons Disease 96%
- Frontal theta and beta oscillations during lower-limb movement in Parkinson’s disease 93%
- Neurofeedback-enabled beta power control with a fully implanted DBS system in patients with Parkinson’s disease 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.