Back

Adaptive laboratory evolution rewires Pseudomonas putida for resource-efficient acetate assimilation

Gurdo, N.; Srinivasan, A.; Tagliani, T.; Filbig, M.; Wirth, N. T.; Johnsen, J.; O'Connell, G. W.; Donati, S.; Orsi, E.; Alvan-Vargas, M. V. G.; Chen, Y.; Petzold, C. J.; Blow, M.; Eng, T.; Tiso, T.; Blank, L. M.; Feist, A.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Nikel, P. I.

2026-08-21 synthetic biology
10.64898/2026.08.20.746122 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Acetate is an attractive renewable two-carbon substrate for microbial biotechnology, but its toxicity limits growth and carbon-use efficiency at process-relevant concentrations. Here, we used adaptive laboratory evolution to improve acetate tolerance in a genome-reduced strain of Pseudomonas putida and combined whole-genome sequencing, reverse engineering, transcriptomics, proteomics, and 13C-acetate fluxomics to resolve the underlying adaptation mechanisms. Evolution under increasing acetate concentrations selected recurrent mutations in gacA and fabB, which encode a global response regulator and a fatty acid biosynthesis enzyme, respectively. Reverse engineering of these mutations recovered most of the evolved phenotype, including shorter lag phase and substantially higher biomass yield from acetate. Multi-omic analyses showed repression of type VI secretion systems, carbohydrate storage functions, fatty acid metabolism, and oxidative stress-associated proteins, indicating resource reallocation away from costly stress and non-essential programs. Fluxomics further revealed reduced EDEMP cycling and increased glyoxylate shunt flux, consistent with improved acetate-carbon retention in biomass. These results establish acetate tolerance in P. putida as a resource-efficiency phenotype and identify gacA and fabB as actionable targets for acetate-based bioproduction.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.