AFIDs-Validator: An Open-Access AI-Guided Platform for Learning Anatomical Landmark Placement
Taha, A.; Bansal, D.; Kai, J.; Kuehn, T.; Stanley, O. W.; Park, P.; Thurairajah, A.; Snyder, M.; Gilmore, G.; Abbass, M.; Mahmoudian, B.; Liu, V. M.; Thrower, J.; Khan, A. R.; Lau, J. C.
Show abstract
Accurate localization of anatomical landmarks is a foundational skill in anatomy and imaging that is often taught informally through expert mentorship, requiring access to data and desktop software. There is no openly accessible, interactive resource that teaches neuroanatomy with quantitative feedback. We present the AFIDs-Validator (validator.afids.io), an open-access, browser-based platform that pairs guided instruction with quantitative assessment. The platform combines (1) a learning mode in which a language-model neuroanatomy tutor operates inside an MRI viewer, giving anatomy-first instruction that responds to the learner's current image slice, orientation, and cursor position; and (2) a validation engine that accepts a learner's landmark file and returns per-landmark Euclidean error against expert-annotated references spanning 21 brain templates. To make the feedback interpretable, we analyzed 15,000 landmark annotations across 132 human subjects and found that landmark difficulty varies fourfold (median error ranged from 0.37 mm at the anterior commissure to 1.50 mm at the temporal horns) with heavy-tailed distributions at every landmark. These distributions are compiled into per-landmark reliability priors, so learners are scored against the empirical spread of trained raters rather than an arbitrary threshold, and difficult landmarks are not mistaken for poor performance. The AFIDs-Validator requires no installation, licensed software, or local data, and all code, reference data, and tutor design are openly released.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning of dissection photographs and surface scanning for quantitative 3D neuropathology 95%
- A generalizable brain extraction net (BEN) for multimodal MRI data from rodents, nonhuman primates, and humans 94%
- Automated hippocampal unfolding for morphometry and subfield segmentation with HippUnfold 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Fine-tuning TrailMap: The utility of transfer learning to improve the performance of deep learning in axon segmentation of light-sheet microscopy images 94%
- Improved cortical boundary registration for locally distorted fMRI scans 93%
- pyKNEEr: An image analysis workflow for open and reproducible research on femoral knee cartilage 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.