Back

Ototoxicity-induced inner-hair-cell specific dysfunction degrades neurometric modulation detection in noise without altering peripheral tuning

Axe, D.; Muthaiah, V. P. K.; Farhadi, A.; Heinz, M. G.

2026-08-25 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.20.746057 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Sensorineural hearing loss can result from different pathologies, but the primary diagnostic method is a threshold-based audiogram, which is insensitive to some forms of cochlear dysfunction. Individuals may experience difficulty understanding speech in noise despite normal audiometric thresholds. Because most cochlear insults damage both inner (IHCs) and outer hair cells (OHCs), the contribution of IHC dysfunction to auditory-nerve coding has been difficult to isolate. We used the IHC-selective ototoxicity of carboplatin in chinchillas to examine how IHC dysfunction, with preserved OHC function, affects temporal-envelope coding in auditory-nerve fibers (ANFs). Carboplatin produced 10 to 20% IHC loss with stereocilia damage in surviving IHCs, while OHC-dependent measures such as DPOAEs and ANF thresholds were unchanged. Suprathreshold ABR wave 1 was reduced, whereas wave 5 was preserved, suggesting central compensation. Both spontaneous and driven firing rates decreased following exposure. Mean vector strength to amplitude-modulated tones was unchanged, but response variability increased. Neurometric analysis and mutual information showed degraded AM detection in carboplatin-exposed fibers, an effect accounted for by reduced driven rate (i.e., normalizing spike counts across groups removed the group difference). Background noise degraded AM coding similarly in both groups. Pooled-neurometric modeling showed that population redundancy compensated for impaired fibers in quiet, but not in noise, where carboplatin-exposed pools remained worse. These findings indicate that IHC dysfunction degrades envelope coding by reducing neural output rather than by altering temporal synchrony. This study suggests IHC dysfunction is a phenotype consistent with "hidden hearing loss" (but distinct from cochlear synaptopathy), and motivates suprathreshold clinical assays.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.