Back

Genetics of Cocaine Consumption and Preference in Drosophila melanogaster

Hatfield, J. S.; Shankar, V.; Anholt, R. R. H.; Mackay, T.

2026-08-22 genetics
10.64898/2026.08.20.746013 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Cocaine Use Disorder (CUD) poses a significant public health and socioeconomic challenge. Determining the genetic basis of predisposition for development of CUD is challenging in human populations but can be studied in Drosophila. We assessed cocaine consumption and cocaine preference of 74,875 flies from 598 sequenced, wild-derived, inbred lines from the expanded Drosophila melanogaster Genetic Reference Panel (DGRP3). We found significant genetic variation, sexual dimorphism, and genetic variation in sexual dimorphism for these traits. Whereas most lines showed cocaine avoidance, ~10% of the lines showed innate cocaine preference in at least one sex. Genome-wide association analyses for cocaine consumption, preference, and micro-environmental variance of these traits identified 2,155 polymorphisms in/near 866 genes that were enriched for Gene Ontology terms associated with neurogenesis, development, and behavior. Many of the associated genes had human orthologs with known associations with CUD and other substance use disorders as well as psychiatric and behavioral traits. We confirmed causal associations with cocaine preference for three polymorphisms with large effect sizes by assessing their effects in DGRP3 lines not included in the initial association analyses. Pairwise associations between these polymorphisms exhibited suppressing epistasis. These polymorphisms are in genes with human orthologs that fulfill essential functions in the nervous system, including the glucose transporter SLC2A8; KCNC2, a subunit of the voltage gated potassium channel; and CHRNA7, a nicotinic cholinergic receptor subunit. Thus, studies on Drosophila can provide insights into the genetic and neural mechanisms of CUD.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.