Back

Modeling two decades of elevational change in endemic bird densities in Hawaiis Kau Rainforest

Patton, P. T.; Judge, S. W.; Royle, J. T.; Sillett, T. S.

2026-08-21 ecology
10.64898/2026.08.20.746003 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Protected areas are vital to the recovery of endangered species. Of the 24 remaining endemic passerines in Hawaii, 16 species are endangered or critically endangered. Yet protected areas in the archipelago are changing as a result of climate change and biological invasions. For example, the non-native southern house mosquito (Culex quinquefasciatus), the primary vector of avian malaria (Plasmodium relictum), has been encroaching upward as higher elevations warm. How the ranges of endemic birds have also shifted their range upward in the Ka[u] Rainforest, the largest native forest on the Island of Hawaii, is not well understood. We used hierarchical distance sampling to characterize how population density has changed from 2002 to 2024 for eight endemic bird species in the Ka[u] Rainforest. For five species, the most parsimonious model included an interaction between year and a quadratic elevation effect. Species that were most common at lower elevations in 2002, e.g., Apapane (Himatione sanguinea), tended to be most common at mid-elevations by 2024. Species that were already most common at higher elevations, such as Iiwi (Drepanis coccinea) and Hawaii [A]kepa (Loxops coccineus), tended to decline in density. For example, Iiwi density at 1,530 m declined from 3.31 birds per ha (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.67-4.11) to 1.34 birds per ha (95% CI: 1.05-1.71), and Hawaii [A]kepa were completely extirpated from elevations below 1,530 m by 2024. Our results demonstrate how the elevational ranges of endemic species have shifted in response to climate change, biological invasions, and habitat degradation. Translating these results into conservation measures may require a more thorough investigation of the causal mechanisms of these range shifts with finer scale habitat data, under the same hierarchical modeling framework.

Matching journals

The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.