Back

Sex differences in diverse conditioned fear behaviors following systemic naloxone administration

Greiner, E. M.; Shansky, R. M.; Laine, M. A.; Fourte, J.

2026-08-20 neuroscience
10.64898/2026.08.20.745978 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Fear conditioning studies have historically relied on freezing as the primary measure of conditioned fear despite evidence that defensive responding is behaviorally diverse and sexually dimorphic. The endogenous opioid system, particularly mu-opioid receptor (MOR) signaling, is known to regulate fear learning and conditioned analgesia, yet its role in alternative fear-related behaviors and sex differences remains unclear. Here, we investigated the effects of systemic naloxone administration prior to auditory fear conditioning on freezing, darting, shock responsivity, and ultrasonic vocalizations (USVs) in male and female rats. Adult Sprague Dawley rats received naloxone (5 mg/kg, i.p.) or saline prior to conditioning and underwent fear recall testing 24 hours later. Naloxone produced sex- and behavior-specific effects across conditioning and recall. During conditioning, naloxone increased freezing in males during baseline and early tone presentations, while females exhibited reduced shock-response velocity and increased post-shock freezing. Naloxone did not significantly alter darting or USV production during conditioning. During recall, freezing behavior did not differ across groups. Naloxone-treated females, however, exhibited a distinct alarm-calling pattern, with fewer callers overall but increased call output among those that vocalized. These findings suggest that MOR antagonism differentially alters distinct components of fear expression in a sex-dependent manner and support the idea that freezing and alarm calling may reflect separable aspects of fear processing.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.