Protein size and geometry govern mutational robustness
Acharya, S.; Dey, S.
Show abstract
A fundamental question in structural biology centres around understanding protein evolution. Key to this process is mutational robustness, defined as the protein fold's ability to absorb sequence changes without collapsing its structure. Here, we show that robustness is systematically shaped by simple features such as protein size, geometry, and oligomeric state. We used Foldseek-identified (structural) homologs to quantify family size across monomers and higher homo-oligomers. We found that proteins in larger families are consistently larger in size, more compact in atomic density, and less exposed to solvent. Strikingly, homo-oligomers occupy systematically larger families than monomers, revealing quaternary structure itself as a driver of mutational tolerance, not merely a functional supplement. This signature of robustness can be further linked to increasing functional complexity in proteins; those with adaptive, multifaceted biological roles belong to larger structural families than those with specific roles, thereby linking structural flexibility directly to evolutionary versatility. In short, simple yet overlooked features of protein geometry can explain mutational robustness and evolvability, offering a structural rationale for why certain protein families have diversified extensively while others remain in evolutionary stasis.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Positively twisted: The complex evolutionary history of Reverse Gyrase suggests a non-hyperthermophilic Last Universal Common Ancestor 93%
- Fine-scale haplotype structure reveals strong signatures of positive selection in a recombining bacterial pathogen 93%
- Unmatched level of molecular convergence among deeply divergent complex multicellular fungi 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.