Back

PAM-DB: Revealing Protein Activation Mechanisms for Next-Generation Rational Drug Discovery

Zhu, X.; Li, X.; Hou, Y.; Zhou, R.; Yan, Y.; Warshel, A.; Bai, C.

2026-08-22 biophysics
10.64898/2026.08.20.745895 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Current rational drug design relies predominantly on computational (CADD/AIDD) methods that model binding thermodynamics and static conformations of target proteins, primarily in their inactive states. However, the kinetic parameters that govern experimental efficacy-such as catalytic turnover and signaling potency-are determined by molecular interactions with transition states (TS), intermediate states (IS), and the entire continuum of conformations along the least free-energy activation pathway. The absence of this dynamic dimension has fundamentally limited the predictive power and success rate of conventional structure-based approaches. Here, we present a structural database that systematically maps the complete activation trajectories of pharmaceutically relevant targets, encompassing TS, IS, and all connecting conformational ensembles. This resource offers multiple strategic advantages for drug discovery: enabling rational targeting of previously "undruggable" proteins, facilitating biased agonism/antagonism design, revealing cryptic allosteric sites in inactive conformations, identifying novel transient pockets along the activation route, rationalizing the mechanisms of existing drugs, predicting mutational effects on activation barriers, and prospectively forecasting drug resistance and off-target liabilities. We demonstrate the utility of this database through representative case studies and provide implementation guidelines for integration into existing discovery pipelines. More detailed information can be found at our website: https://www.momedpamdb.com/en.

Matching journals

The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.